• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

J Infect Dis . Stroke Following COVID-19 Vaccination: Evidence Based on Different Designs of Real-World Studies

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
J Infect Dis


. 2023 Aug 3;jiad306.
doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiad306. Online ahead of print. Stroke Following COVID-19 Vaccination: Evidence Based on Different Designs of Real-World Studies

Junyu Liu[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP], Fang Cao[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Chun Luo[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Yuxin Guo[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Junxia Yan[SUP] 3 4 [/SUP]



Affiliations
Abstract

Background: We aimed to evaluate the association between coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccination and the risk of stroke.
Method: We conducted a systematic meta-analysis of studies published until December 24, 2022, using PubMed and the Cochrane database; real-world studies using cohort, self-controlled case series (SCCS), and case-crossover study (CCOS) designs were identified to evaluate the incidence risk ratios (IRRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of ischemic stroke (IS), hemorrhagic stroke (HS), and cerebral venous sinus thrombosis (CVST) following COVID-19 vaccination. Random-effects meta-analyses were performed to pool the risks of IS and HS among subpopulations categorized by vaccine type, dose, age, and sex. Sensitivity analysis was performed after stratification by defined risk periods.
Results: Fourteen observational studies involving 79,918,904 individuals were included. Cohort studies showed decreased risks of IS (IRR [95% CI], 0.82 [0.75-0.90]) and HS (IRR [95% CI], 0.75 [0.67-0.85]) post-vaccination, but no association with CVST was found (IRR [95% CI], 1.18 [0.70-1.98]). SCCS identified increased risks 1-21 days (IRR [95% CI]IS, 1.05 [1.00-1.10]; IRR [95% CI]HS, 1.16 [1.06-1.26]) or 1-28 days (IRR [95% CI]IS, 1.04 [1.00-1.08]; IRR [95% CI]HS, 1.37 [1.15-1.64]) post-vaccination, similar to CVST (IRR [95% CI], 1.58 [1.08-2.32]). A CCOS reported an increased risk of CVST after vaccination using ChAdOx1 (IRR [95% CI], 2.9 [1.1-7.2]).
Discussion: Although different study designs yielded inconsistent findings, considering the relatively low background incidence of stroke and benefits of vaccination, even a potentially increased risk of stroke post-vaccination should not justify vaccine hesitancy.

Keywords: COVID-19; Meta-analysis; Real-world study; Stroke; Vaccination.

 
Back
Top Bottom