• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

J Infect Dis . Risk of Subsequent Respiratory Virus Detection After Primary Virus Detection in a Community Household Study - King County, Washingto

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
J Infect Dis


. 2023 Aug 2;jiad305.
doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiad305. Online ahead of print. Risk of Subsequent Respiratory Virus Detection After Primary Virus Detection in a Community Household Study - King County, Washington 2019-2021

Jessica Heimonen[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Eric J Chow[SUP] 1 2 3 [/SUP], Yongzhe Wang[SUP] 1 [/SUP], James P Hughes[SUP] 4 5 [/SUP], Julia Rogers[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Anne Emanuels[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Jessica O'Hanlon[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Peter D Han[SUP] 6 [/SUP], Caitlin R Wolf[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Jennifer K Logue[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Constance E Ogokeh[SUP] 7 8 [/SUP], Melissa A Rolfes[SUP] 7 [/SUP], Timothy M Uyeki[SUP] 7 [/SUP], Lea Starita[SUP] 6 9 [/SUP], Janet A Englund[SUP] 10 11 [/SUP], Helen Y Chu[SUP] 1 [/SUP]



Affiliations
Abstract

Background: The epidemiology of respiratory viral infections is complex. How infection with one respiratory virus affects risk of subsequent infection with the same or another respiratory virus is not well described.
Methods: We retrospectively analyzed data from a longitudinal household cohort study from October 2019-June 2021. Enrolled households completed active surveillance for acute respiratory illness (ARI), and participants with ARI self-collected nasal swabs; after April 2020, participants with ARI or laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 and their household members self-collected nasal swabs. Specimens were tested via multiplex RT-PCR for respiratory viruses. A Cox regression model with a time-dependent covariate examined risk of subsequent detections following a specific primary viral detection.
Results: Rhinovirus was the most frequently detected pathogen in study specimens (n=406, 9.5%). Among 51 participants with multiple viral detections, rhinovirus to seasonal coronavirus (8, 14.8%) was the most common viral detection pairing. Relative to no primary detection, there was a 1.03-2.06-fold increase in risk of subsequent virus detection in the 90 days following primary detection; risk varied by primary virus: parainfluenza, rhinovirus, and respiratory syncytial virus were statistically significant.
Conclusions: Primary virus detection was associated with higher risk of subsequent virus detection within the first 90 days after primary detection.

Keywords: Respiratory viral infection; co-infection; household transmission; seasonal epidemic; viral interference.

 
Back
Top Bottom