• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

J Infect Dis . Point-of-care influenza testing impacts clinical decision, patient flow and length of stay in hospitalized adults

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
J Infect Dis


. 2020 Nov 5;jiaa690.
doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiaa690. Online ahead of print.
Point-of-care influenza testing impacts clinical decision, patient flow and length of stay in hospitalized adults


E B Fjelltveit[SUP] 1 2 3 [/SUP], R J Cox[SUP] 1 4 [/SUP], J ?stensj?[SUP] 5 [/SUP], B Blomberg[SUP] 2 6 [/SUP], M H Ebbesen[SUP] 4 [/SUP], N Langeland[SUP] 2 6 7 5 [/SUP], K G-I Mohn[SUP] 1 3 [/SUP]



Affiliations

Abstract

Background: Influenza is difficult to distinguish clinically from other acute respiratory infections. Rapid laboratory diagnosis can help initiate early effective antiviral treatment and isolation.
Aim: Implementing a novel point-of-care test (POCT) for influenza in the emergency department (ED) could improve treatment and isolation strategies and reduce the length-of-stay (LOS).
Methods: In a prospective, controlled observational cohort study, we enrolled patients admitted due to acute respiratory illness to two public hospitals in Bergen, Norway, one using a rapid POCT for influenza (n=400), the other (n=167) using conventional rapid lab-based assay.
Results: The prevalence of influenza was similar in the two hospitals (154/400, 38% versus 38%, 63/167, p=0.863), and most patients in both hospitals received antiviral (83% versus 81%,p=0.703) and antibiotic treatment (76% versus 73%, p= 0.469). Isolation was more often initiated in the ED in the hospital using POCT (91% versus 80%, p=0.025). Diagnosis by POCT was associated with shorter hospital stay, while old age, diabetes, cancer, use of antibiotics, particularly broad-spectrum antibiotics, were associated with prolonged stay.
Conclusions: POCT implementation in the ED resulted in improved targeted isolation and shorter LOS. Regardless of POCT-use, most influenza patients received antivirals (>80%) and antibiotics (>70%).

Keywords: Influenza; antibiotics; hospitalized adults; isolation; length-of-stay; molecular assay; neuraminidase inhibitor; point-of-care test.
 
Back
Top Bottom