• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

J Infect Dis . Laboratory Methods for Monitoring Influenza Antiviral Resistance

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
J Infect Dis


. 2025 Oct 17;232(Supplement_3):S273-S285.
doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiaf299. Laboratory Methods for Monitoring Influenza Antiviral Resistance

Emi Takashita[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Cameron R Wolfe[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Jeremy C Jones[SUP] 3 [/SUP]



Affiliations
Abstract

Monitoring antiviral susceptibility is an essential component of virologic surveillance conducted by laboratories participating in the World Health Organization (WHO) Global Influenza Surveillance and Response System (GISRS). Since 2011, the WHO Expert Working Group on Surveillance of Influenza Antiviral Susceptibility (WHO-AVWG) has annually published recommendations for assessing antiviral susceptibility of circulating viruses. This approach includes (i) screening viral RNA sequences for amino acid substitutions (molecular markers) known or suspected to confer reduced susceptibility, and (ii) testing viruses for antiviral susceptibility. Recently, next-generation sequencing of the whole viral genome has been implemented in many reference laboratories and could be used to test clinical specimens. Susceptibility to neuraminidase inhibitors (NAIs) is analyzed using neuraminidase activity-based assays with small synthetic substrates, while susceptibility to baloxavir is determined using replication-based assays. Since laboratory correlates of clinically significant antiviral resistance are not yet established, interpretation of antiviral testing outcomes follows the arbitrary WHO-AVWG criteria, where 50% inhibitory/effective concentration (IC50/EC50) values are compared to a virus type-, subtype-, or lineage-specific median to determine a fold change. For NAIs, the level of the enzyme's inhibition is reported as normal (<10-fold; <5-fold), reduced (10- to 100-fold; 5- to 50-fold), or highly reduced (>100-fold; >50-fold) for types A and B, respectively. For baloxavir, reduced susceptibility is provisionally defined as >3-fold above the median EC50. Additional considerations including preclinical testing in animal models may shed further light on antiviral susceptibility related to drug exposures relevant to humans and the fitness of viruses that contain reduced drug susceptibility genotypes. This framework provides a harmonized approach for monitoring antiviral susceptibility of influenza viruses needed to inform public health responses and clinical management.

Keywords: baloxavir; endonuclease inhibitor; neuraminidase inhibitor; resistance; surveillance.

 
Back
Top