• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

J Infect Dis. Comparative Reactogenicity of Enhanced Influenza Vaccines in Older Adults

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
J Infect Dis. 2020 May 14. pii: jiaa255. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiaa255. [Epub ahead of print]
Comparative Reactogenicity of Enhanced Influenza Vaccines in Older Adults.


Cowling BJ[SUP]1[/SUP], Thompson MG[SUP]2[/SUP], Ng TWY[SUP]1[/SUP], Fang VJ[SUP]1[/SUP], Perera RAPM[SUP]1[/SUP], Leung NHL[SUP]1[/SUP], Chen Y[SUP]1[/SUP], So HC[SUP]1[/SUP], Ip DKM[SUP]1[/SUP], Iuliano AD[SUP]2[/SUP].

Author information




Abstract

BACKGROUND:

We analysed data from a randomized controlled trial on the reactogenicity of three enhanced influenza vaccines compared to standard-dose inactivated influenza vaccine.
METHODS:

We enrolled community-dwelling older adults in Hong Kong, and randomly allocated them to receive 2017/18 northern hemisphere formulations of: standard-dose vaccine (FluQuadri, Sanofi Pasteur); MF59-adjuvanted vaccine (FLUAD, Seqirus); high-dose vaccine (Fluzone High Dose, Sanofi Pasteur); or recombinant-hemagglutinin vaccine (Flublok, Sanofi Pasteur). Local and systemic reactions were evaluated at Days 1, 3, 7 and 14 after vaccination.
RESULTS:

Reported reactions were generally mild and short-lived. Systemic reactions occurred in similar proportions of participants by vaccine. Some local reactions were slightly more frequently reported among recipients of the MF59-adjuvanted vaccine and the high-dose vaccine compared to standard dose recipients. Participants reporting feverishness one day after vaccination had mean-fold-rises in post-vaccination hemagglutination inhibition titers that were 1.85-fold higher (95% CI: 1.01, 3.38) for A(H1N1) compared to those who did not report feverishness.
CONCLUSIONS:

Some acute local reactions were more frequent following vaccination with MF59-adjuvanted and high-dose influenza vaccines compared to standard-dose inactivated influenza vaccine, while systemic symptoms occurred at similar frequencies in all groups. The association between feverishness and immunogenicity should be further investigated in a larger population.
? The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press for the Infectious Diseases Society of America. All rights reserved. For permissions, e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.



KEYWORDS:

influenza; reactogenicity; vaccination


PMID:32407535DOI:10.1093/infdis/jiaa255
 
Back
Top Bottom