• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

J Infect Chemother . The efficacy and safety of a quadrivalent live attenuated influenza nasal vaccine in Japanese children: a phase 3, randomized,

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
J Infect Chemother


. 2024 Jul 1:S1341-321X(24)00178-8.
doi: 10.1016/j.jiac.2024.06.023. Online ahead of print. The efficacy and safety of a quadrivalent live attenuated influenza nasal vaccine in Japanese children: a phase 3, randomized, placebo-controlled study

Tetsuo Nakayama[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Takuya Hayashi[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Kentaro Makino[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Keiji Oe[SUP] 4 [/SUP]



Affiliations
Abstract

Background: Vaccination is the primary method of preventing influenza infection and complications in young children. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of a single dose of MEDI3250 (intranasal, quadrivalent, live attenuated influenza vaccine) in healthy Japanese children during the 2016/17 influenza season.
Methods: In this multicenter, randomized, double-blind, phase 3 study (jRCT2080223345), participants aged 2-18 years received MEDI3250 or placebo (2:1), stratified by age (2-6 years, 7-18 years). The primary and secondary endpoints were the incidence of confirmed symptomatic onset of influenza caused by a circulating wild-type strain or by a vaccine-matched strain, respectively. Safety outcomes included the incidence of adverse events (AEs) and vaccine-related AEs.
Results: Overall, 910 participants received MEDI3250 (n = 608) or placebo (n = 302). For the primary endpoint (regardless of the influenza subtype), the incidence of influenza onset was 25.5% (MEDI3250) and 35.9% (placebo); relative risk reduction, 28.8% (95% confidence interval, 12.5% to 42.0%). For the secondary endpoint (vaccine-matched strain), the incidence was 10.9% (MEDI3250) and 17.2% (placebo); relative risk reduction, 36.6% (95% confidence interval, 6.5% to 56.8%). Solicited AEs occurred in 67.6% (MEDI3250) and 63.6% (placebo). Most events were mild; nasal discharge was most common (59.2% [MEDI3250] and 52.6% [placebo]). Unsolicited AEs occurred in 36.0% (MEDI3250) and 33.1% (placebo). The most common unsolicited vaccine-related AE was diarrhea (2.3%, both groups).
Conclusions: MEDI3250 had a greater preventive effect against influenza onset in Japanese children than placebo; no new safety signals were observed relative to previous clinical and post-marketing studies of MEDI3250.

Keywords: Japan; intranasal vaccine; pediatric; seasonal influenza; vaccine efficacy; vaccine safety.

 
Back
Top Bottom