tetano
Editor, Senior Moderator
J Infect Chemother
. 2023 Jul 20;S1341-321X(23)00170-8.
doi: 10.1016/j.jiac.2023.07.008. Online ahead of print. Immunogenicity and safety of influenza vaccine in patients with lung cancer receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors: A single-center prospective cohort study
Kei Nakashima[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Yuya Homma[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Jumpei Taniguchi[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Norihiko Kubota[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Ayumu Otsuki[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Hiroyuki Ito[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Yoshihito Otsuka[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Kyoko Kondo[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Satoko Ohfuji[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Wakaba Fukushima[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Yoshio Hirota[SUP] 6 [/SUP]
Affiliations
Introduction: Patients with lung cancer have a high risk of influenza complications. International guidelines recommend annual influenza vaccination for patients with cancer. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are progressively used to treat lung cancer. Data regarding immunogenicity and safety of influenza vaccine are limited in patients with lung cancer receiving ICIs; therefore, we conducted this single-center, prospective observational study in the Japanese population.
Methods: Patients with lung cancer receiving ICIs and influenza immunization were enrolled. Blood samples were collected from patients for serum antibody titer measurement pre- and 4 ± 1 weeks post-vaccination. The primary endpoint was seroprotection rate (sP) at 4 ± 1 weeks post-vaccination. The secondary endpoints were geometric mean titer (GMT), mean fold rise, seroresponse rate (sR), seroconversion rate (sC), and immune-related adverse events (irAEs), defined as adverse effects caused by ICI administration, 6 months post-vaccination.
Results: Influenza vaccination in the 23 patients included in the immunogenicity analyses significantly increased GMT for all strains, and sP, sR, and sC were 52%-91%, 26%-39%, and 26%-35%, respectively. In the 24 patients included in the safety analyses, 7 (29%) and 5 (21%) patients exhibited systemic and local reactions, respectively. Only one patient (4%) (hypothyroidism, grade 2) showed post-vaccination irAEs.
Conclusions: Overall, influenza vaccination in patients with lung cancer receiving ICIs showed acceptable immunogenicity and safety, thus supporting annual influenza vaccination in this population.
Keywords: Immune checkpoint inhibitor; Immunogenicity; Influenza vaccine; Lung cancer; Safety.
. 2023 Jul 20;S1341-321X(23)00170-8.
doi: 10.1016/j.jiac.2023.07.008. Online ahead of print. Immunogenicity and safety of influenza vaccine in patients with lung cancer receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors: A single-center prospective cohort study
Kei Nakashima[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Yuya Homma[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Jumpei Taniguchi[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Norihiko Kubota[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Ayumu Otsuki[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Hiroyuki Ito[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Yoshihito Otsuka[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Kyoko Kondo[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Satoko Ohfuji[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Wakaba Fukushima[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Yoshio Hirota[SUP] 6 [/SUP]
Affiliations
- PMID: 37481070
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jiac.2023.07.008
Introduction: Patients with lung cancer have a high risk of influenza complications. International guidelines recommend annual influenza vaccination for patients with cancer. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are progressively used to treat lung cancer. Data regarding immunogenicity and safety of influenza vaccine are limited in patients with lung cancer receiving ICIs; therefore, we conducted this single-center, prospective observational study in the Japanese population.
Methods: Patients with lung cancer receiving ICIs and influenza immunization were enrolled. Blood samples were collected from patients for serum antibody titer measurement pre- and 4 ± 1 weeks post-vaccination. The primary endpoint was seroprotection rate (sP) at 4 ± 1 weeks post-vaccination. The secondary endpoints were geometric mean titer (GMT), mean fold rise, seroresponse rate (sR), seroconversion rate (sC), and immune-related adverse events (irAEs), defined as adverse effects caused by ICI administration, 6 months post-vaccination.
Results: Influenza vaccination in the 23 patients included in the immunogenicity analyses significantly increased GMT for all strains, and sP, sR, and sC were 52%-91%, 26%-39%, and 26%-35%, respectively. In the 24 patients included in the safety analyses, 7 (29%) and 5 (21%) patients exhibited systemic and local reactions, respectively. Only one patient (4%) (hypothyroidism, grade 2) showed post-vaccination irAEs.
Conclusions: Overall, influenza vaccination in patients with lung cancer receiving ICIs showed acceptable immunogenicity and safety, thus supporting annual influenza vaccination in this population.
Keywords: Immune checkpoint inhibitor; Immunogenicity; Influenza vaccine; Lung cancer; Safety.