• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

J Infect Chemother . Factors affecting the sensitivity of quantitative severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 antigen test

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
J Infect Chemother


. 2023 Apr 12;S1341-321X(23)00096-X.
doi: 10.1016/j.jiac.2023.04.005. Online ahead of print.
Factors affecting the sensitivity of quantitative severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 antigen test


Yuki Sato[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Ryosei Murai[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Ryo Kobayashi[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Atsuo Togashi[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Yoshihiro Fujiya[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Koji Kuronuma[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Satoshi Takahashi[SUP] 6 [/SUP]



Affiliations
Free PMC article

Abstract

Introduction: The accuracy of nucleic acid amplification tests (NAATs) is affected by various factors; however, studies examining the factors affecting the accuracy of quantitative severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) antigen test (QAT) are limited.
Methods: A total of 347 nasopharyngeal samples were collected from patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), and the date of onset was obtained from the electronic medical records. The SARS-CoV-2 antigen level was measured using Lumipulse Presto SARS-CoV-2 Ag (Presto), while NAAT was performed using the Ampdirect 2019-nCoV Detection Kit.
Results: Presto had a sensitivity rate of 95.1% (95% confidence interval: 92.8-97.4) in detecting the SARS-CoV-2 antigen in 347 samples. The number of days from symptom onset to sample collection was negatively correlated with the amount of antigen (r = -0.515) and sensitivity of Presto (r = -0.711). The patients' age was lower in the Presto-negative samples (median age, 39 years) compared with that in the Presto-positive samples (median age, 53 years; p < 0.01). A significant positive correlation was observed between age (excluding teenagers) and Presto sensitivity (r = 0.764). Meanwhile, no association was found between the mutant strain, sex, and Presto results.
Conclusion: Presto is useful for the accurate diagnosis of COVID-19 owing to its high sensitivity when the number of days from symptom onset to sample collection is within 12 days. Furthermore, age may affect the results of Presto, and this tool has a relatively low sensitivity in younger patients.

Keywords: Chemiluminescent enzyme immunoassay system; Days from onset; Quantitative SARS-CoV-2 antigen test; SARS-CoV-2; Sensitivity.
 
Back
Top Bottom