• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

J Infect Chemother . Discrepancy of SARS-CoV-2 PCR results due to the sample collection sites and possible improper sampling

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
J Infect Chemother


. 2021 Jul 16;S1341-321X(21)00191-4.
doi: 10.1016/j.jiac.2021.07.008. Online ahead of print.
Discrepancy of SARS-CoV-2 PCR results due to the sample collection sites and possible improper sampling


Satoshi Irifune[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Nobuyuki Ashizawa[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Takahiro Takazono[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Pierre Mutantu[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Takeshi Nabeshima[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Mya Myat Ngwe Tun[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Kenji Ota[SUP] 6 [/SUP], Tatsuro Hirayama[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Ayumi Fujita[SUP] 7 [/SUP], Masato Tashiro[SUP] 8 [/SUP], Takeshi Tanaka[SUP] 7 [/SUP], Kazuko Yamamoto[SUP] 9 [/SUP], Yoshifumi Imamura[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Taiga Miyazaki[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Toyomitsu Sawai[SUP] 10 [/SUP], Koichi Izumikawa[SUP] 8 [/SUP], Katsunori Yanagihara[SUP] 6 [/SUP], Kouichi Morita[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Hiroshi Mukae[SUP] 1 [/SUP]



Affiliations

Abstract

Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is necessary for confirming a diagnosis of Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Here we present a COVID-19 case of an elderly woman whose SARS-CoV-2 PCR tests showed false negative repeatedly by evaluating with different sampling sites and procedures. Nasopharyngeal swabs, suctioned sputum, and tongue swabs were collected for SARS-CoV-2-PCR. As for tongue swabs, we compared between two different sample conditions; one obtained with dry condition and the other obtained with moistened condition inside the oral cavity. SARS-CoV-2-PCR showed positive for an extended period with suctioned sputum samples compared with nasopharyngeal swabs and tongue swabs. No SARS-CoV-2 from a nasopharyngeal swab sample obtained on day 46 after symptoms onset was isolated despite high viral load (183740.5 copies/5μL). An adequate production of neutralizing antibody in a serum sample on day 46 was also confirmed. The number of RNA copies of the tongue swab samples was higher with moistened condition than with dry condition. The present case suggests that the difference of sampling site or sample condition can affect PCR results. High loads viral RNA detection does not always correlate with infectivity.

Keywords: COVID-19; False-negative; Infectivity; PCR; SARS-CoV-2.
 
Back
Top Bottom