• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

J Infect Chemother . Comparative evaluation of the GeneSoC FluA/B Detection Kit for influenza A and B virus detection using archived nasopharyngeal sp

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
J Infect Chemother

. 2026 Sep 25:103085.
doi: 10.1016/j.jiac.2026.103085. Online ahead of print.

Comparative evaluation of the GeneSoC FluA/B Detection Kit for influenza A and B virus detection using archived nasopharyngeal specimens​


Yuki Sato 1 , Shinya Nirasawa 1 , Yoshihiro Fujiya 2 , Satoshi Takahashi 3

Affiliations


Abstract​


Background: Rapid nucleic acid amplification tests (rapid NAATs) may facilitate timely influenza diagnosis. This study evaluated the agreement of the GeneSoC® FluA/B Detection Kit (GeneSoC Flu), a rapid NAAT for detecting influenza A and B viruses.


Methods: A preselected panel of 180 nasopharyngeal swab specimens initially classified by prior clinical testing as FluA positive (n = 60), FluB positive (n = 70), or negative (n = 50) was evaluated. The same purified RNA extract from each specimen was tested using GeneSoC Flu, a National Institute of Infectious Diseases (NIID)-based real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) method, and the TRexGene SARS-CoV-2&FluA/B Detection Kit.


Results: For detection of either influenza A or B virus, the overall percent agreement, positive percent agreement, and negative percent agreement of GeneSoC Flu were 99.4%, 99.2%, and 100.0%, respectively, relative to both the NIID-based method and TRexGene. Only two specimens yielded discordant initial results, and both had very low RNA copy numbers estimated from the NIID-based RT-PCR calibration curve. In addition, the cycle threshold (Ct) values obtained with GeneSoC Flu and TRexGene were strongly inversely correlated with estimated RNA levels (Spearman's ρ, -0.97 to -0.93; p < 0.01).


Conclusions: GeneSoC Flu showed high agreement with the comparator NAATs using shared purified RNA extracts. Prospective evaluation of the complete sample-to-result workflow is required to establish its real-world diagnostic performance and turnaround time.

Keywords: GeneSoC; influenza virus; microfluidic chip; nucleic acid amplification test; rapid molecular assay.
 
Back
Top Bottom