• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

J Immunol . Distinct Cellular Immune Responses to SARS-CoV-2 in Pregnant Women

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
J Immunol


. 2022 Apr 4;ji2101123.
doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.2101123. Online ahead of print.
Distinct Cellular Immune Responses to SARS-CoV-2 in Pregnant Women


Nardhy Gomez-Lopez[SUP] 1 2 3 [/SUP], Roberto Romero[SUP] 1 4 5 6 7 [/SUP], Li Tao[SUP] 8 2 [/SUP], Meyer Gershater[SUP] 8 2 [/SUP], Yaozhu Leng[SUP] 8 2 [/SUP], Chengrui Zou[SUP] 8 2 [/SUP], Marcelo Farias-Jofre[SUP] 8 2 [/SUP], Jose Galaz[SUP] 8 2 [/SUP], Derek Miller[SUP] 8 2 [/SUP], Adi L Tarca[SUP] 8 2 9 [/SUP], Marcia Arenas-Hernandez[SUP] 8 2 [/SUP], Gaurav Bhatti[SUP] 8 2 [/SUP], Valeria Garcia-Flores[SUP] 8 2 [/SUP], Zhenjie Liu[SUP] 8 2 [/SUP], Robert Para[SUP] 8 2 [/SUP], Tomi Kanninen[SUP] 8 2 [/SUP], Ola Hadaya[SUP] 8 2 [/SUP], Carmen Paredes[SUP] 8 2 [/SUP], Yi Xu[SUP] 8 2 [/SUP]



Affiliations

Abstract

Pregnant women are at increased risk of adverse outcomes, including preeclampsia and preterm birth, that may result from severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection. Pregnancy imprints specific maternal immune responses that can modulate host susceptibility to microbial infection; therefore, recent studies have focused on the humoral response against SARS-CoV-2 in pregnant women. However, the pregnancy-specific cellular immune responses triggered by SARS-CoV-2 infection are poorly understood. In this study, we undertook an extensive in vitro investigation to determine the cellular immune responses to SARS-CoV-2 particles and proteins/peptides in pregnant women. First, we show that SARS-CoV-2 particles do not alter the pregnancy-specific oxidative burst of neutrophils and monocytes. Yet, SARS-CoV-2 particles/proteins shift monocyte activation from the classical to intermediate states in pregnant, but not in nonpregnant, women. Furthermore, SARS-CoV-2 proteins, but not particles or peptide pools, mildly enhance T cell activation during pregnancy. As expected, B cell phenotypes are heavily modulated by SARS-CoV-2 particles in all women; yet, pregnancy itself further modified such responses in these adaptive immune cells. Lastly, we report that pregnancy itself governs cytokine responses in the maternal circulation, of which IFN-β and IL-8 were diminished upon SARS-CoV-2 challenge. Collectively, these findings highlight the differential in vitro responses to SARS-CoV-2 in pregnant and nonpregnant women and shed light on the immune mechanisms implicated in coronavirus disease 2019 during pregnancy.
 
Back
Top Bottom