• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

J Hazard Mater . Indoor airflow effect on the detectability of airborne pathogens: Simulation with computational fluid dynamics and validation with

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
J Hazard Mater


. 2026 Feb 23:506:141591.
doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2026.141591. Online ahead of print.
Indoor airflow effect on the detectability of airborne pathogens: Simulation with computational fluid dynamics and validation with field PCR measurements

Sanggwon An[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Sangsoo Choi[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Gihyeon Yu[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Jiwoo Jung[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Jungho Hwang[SUP] 5 [/SUP]


Affiliations
Abstract

Detecting airborne pathogens (bioaerosols), such as bacteria and viruses, in multi-use facilities is important to prevent infection through the air. To that end, a sufficient volume of air is necessary to detect pathogens with polymerase chain reaction (PCR) tests. However, determining positions at which air samplers should be located in such facilities can be challenging. In this work, we performed case studies in an office for students, in which a ceiling-type air conditioner and an air purifier were installed, to evaluate the effects of indoor airflow on the detectability of airborne pathogens. Airflow patterns and trajectories of saliva droplet aerosols generated by an infected person were investigated to estimate the number of aerosols entering each air sampler. The airflow patterns strongly influenced the spatial distribution of droplet aerosols, which led to pronounced variations in the sampling results. Locating air samplers in air flow recirculation regions consistently yielded the highest sample concentrations, which suggests that aerosols were not uniformly dispersed throughout the space but instead were accumulated in specific regions due to the influence of airflow. Consistently, during long-term air sampling, infectious bioaerosols (influenza A, HCoV-229E, and Bordetella pertussis) were detected with PCR tests in regions where the flow was recirculated, but not where it was stagnant. These results demonstrate that airflow patterns influence the distribution of bioaerosols in the air, which leads to the accumulation of aerosols in specific areas. Therefore, selecting sampling locations strategically is essential to detect airborne pathogens in indoor environments and also to place mitigation devices.

Keywords: Airborne bacteria; Airborne virus; Field test; Indoor environment; Respiratory infection.

 
Back
Top Bottom