• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

J Glob Infect Dis . Incidence of Secondary Bacterial Infections Following Utilization of Tocilizumab for the Treatment of COVID-19 - A Matched Retro

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
J Glob Infect Dis


. 2021 Mar 22;13(2):67-71.
doi: 10.4103/jgid.jgid_358_20. eCollection Apr-Jun 2021.
Incidence of Secondary Bacterial Infections Following Utilization of Tocilizumab for the Treatment of COVID-19 - A Matched Retrospective Cohort Study


Joanna L Moore[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Stephanie J Stroever[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Patricia E Rondain[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Robyn N Scatena[SUP] 3 [/SUP]



Affiliations

Abstract

Introduction: Immunosuppressive agents are theorized to target the cytokine storm syndrome in COVID-19. However, the downstream effects regarding susceptibilities to secondary infection risk remains unknown. This study seeks to determine risk differences for secondary infections among COVID-19 patients who did and did not receive tocilizumab.
Methods: We conducted a matched retrospective cohort study from two large, acute care hospitals in Western Connecticut from March 1, to May 31, 2020. We collected variables using manual medical record abstraction. The primary exposure variable was any dose of tocilizumab. The primary outcome was any healthcare-associated bacterial or fungal infection as defined by the National Healthcare Safety Network. We performed a Kaplan-Meier analysis to assess the crude difference in cumulative probability of healthcare-associated infection (HAI) across exposure groups. We also performed a multivariable Cox regression analysis to determine the hazard ratio for HAI by exposure group while controlling for potential confounders.
Results: The Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated no difference in the cumulative probability of HAI across groups. The adjusted hazard of HAI for patients given tocilizumab was 0.85 times that of patients not given tocilizumab (95% confidence interval = 0.29, 2.52, P = 0.780) after controlling for relevant confounders.
Conclusions: Tocilizumab did not increase the incidence of secondary infection among COVID-19 patients. Larger, randomized trials should evaluate infection as a secondary outcome to validate this finding.

Keywords: COVID-19; Coronavirus; IL-6; SARS-CoV-2; secondary infection; tocilizumab.
 
Back
Top Bottom