• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

J Gen Virol . Molecular surveillance and predictive risk modelling of avian influenza virus in wild birds in Egypt

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
J Gen Virol


. 2026 Jun;107(6):002278.
doi: 10.1099/jgv.0.002278.
Molecular surveillance and predictive risk modelling of avian influenza virus in wild birds in Egypt

Nehal M Nabil[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Maram M Tawakol[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Naglaa Hagag[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Samah Eid[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Liam Brierley[SUP] 2 3 [/SUP], Mahmoud M Naguib[SUP] 3 4 [/SUP]


Affiliations
Abstract

Avian influenza viruses (AIVs) continue to circulate and pose a persistent threat to animal and public health in Egypt, a country located along major migratory birds' flyways that enable repeated viral incursions. In this study, a total of 1,087 wild birds representing 19 species were sampled to assess the role of migratory wild birds in virus introduction and spread. Six species were found positive for AIV, with Eurasian teal showing the highest prevalence (12.3%). The H5 subtype was found predominant, representing 70.3% of positive cases, whereas H9 was detected in 9.9% of positive cases. Moreover, coinfections with H5/H9 were observed in Eurasian teal, Common moorhen and Northern pintail, suggesting opportunities for cocirculation among migratory species. To predict areas at high risk of AIV detection, these findings were integrated with additional publicly available geolocated AIV sampling records and a spatial machine learning (ML) model was trained. The model demonstrated moderate predictive performance (Area Under Curve =0.608; F1=0.596) and highlighted relative humidity, temperature and proximity to wetlands as primary predictors of AIV detection. In addition, risk projections for early winter underscore several areas including the Nile Delta, Nile River corridor, southern wetlands near Lake Nasser, the south-eastern Red Sea coast and the north-western Siwa region as areas of high risk of AIV detection. The findings of this study demonstrate the role of migratory wild birds in the spread and introduction of AIV into Egypt, particularly H5, and provide an ML-based model to predict areas of high risk of virus detection in Egypt, which could in turn strengthen early detection and guide mitigation strategies.

Keywords: Avian influenza virus; Egypt; machine learning; migratory birds; spatial risk modelling.

 
Back
Top