• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

J Gen Intern Med . Comparing Associations of State Reopening Strategies with COVID-19 Burden

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
J Gen Intern Med


. 2020 Oct 6.
doi: 10.1007/s11606-020-06277-0. Online ahead of print.
Comparing Associations of State Reopening Strategies with COVID-19 Burden


Brystana G Kaufman[SUP] 1 2 3 [/SUP], Rebecca Whitaker[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Nirosha Mahendraratnam Lederer[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Valerie A Lewis[SUP] 5 6 7 [/SUP], Mark B McClellan[SUP] 4 [/SUP]



Affiliations

Abstract

Background: The novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infected over 5 million United States (US) residents resulting in more than 180,000 deaths by August 2020. To mitigate transmission, most states ordered shelter-in-place orders in March and reopening strategies varied.
Objective: To estimate excess COVID-19 cases and deaths after reopening compared with trends prior to reopening for two groups of states: (1) states with an evidence-based reopening strategy, defined as reopening indoor dining after implementing a statewide mask mandate, and (2) states reopening indoor dining rooms before implementing a statewide mask mandate.
Design: Interrupted time series quasi-experimental study design applied to publicly available secondary data.
Participants: Fifty United States and the District of Columbia.
Interventions: Reopening indoor dining rooms before or after implementing a statewide mask mandate.
Main measures: Outcomes included daily cumulative COVID-19 cases and deaths for each state.
Key results: On average, the number of excess cases per 100,000 residents in states reopening without masks is ten times the number in states reopening with masks after 8 weeks (643.1 cases; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 406.9, 879.2 and 62.9 cases; CI = 12.6, 113.1, respectively). Excess cases after 6 weeks could have been reduced by 90% from 576,371 to 63,062 and excess deaths reduced by 80% from 22,851 to 4858 had states implemented mask mandates prior to reopening. Over 50,000 excess deaths were prevented within 6 weeks in 13 states that implemented mask mandates prior to reopening.
Conclusions: Additional mitigation measures such as mask use counteract the potential growth in COVID-19 cases and deaths due to reopening businesses. This study contributes to the growing evidence that mask usage is essential for mitigating community transmission of COVID-19. States should delay further reopening until mask mandates are fully implemented, and enforcement by local businesses will be critical for preventing potential future closures.
 
Back
Top Bottom