• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

J Epidemiol Community Health. Estimating Influenza vaccine effectiveness using routinely collected laboratory data.

Giuseppe

Emeritus
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2009 Nov 12. [Epub ahead of print]

Estimating Influenza vaccine effectiveness using routinely collected laboratory data.

Fleming DM, Andrews NJ, Elllis JS, Bermingham A, Sebastianpillai P, Elliot AJ, Miller E, Zambon M. - United Kingdom;

BACKGROUND:
There is a need for real-time, within season, estimation of influenza vaccine effectiveness (V/E) in order to optimize management of circulating influenza; a need which will be even greater in a pandemic situation.

OBJECTIVE:
To examine the potential of using routinely collected national virological surveillance data to generate estimates of V/E in real-time.

METHODS:
Information collected in the integrated clinical and virological community influenza surveillance program of the Royal College of General Practitioners and Health Protection Agency over three winters 2004/5-2006/7 was used. From vaccination and clinical data entered on the investigation request form and the influenza virology detection result, we calculated the odds of vaccination in virus positive and in virus negative persons. One minus the ratio of these odds provided crude estimates of V/E, which were adjusted for confounding using logistic regression.

RESULTS:
Multivariate analysis suggested that adjustments were necessary for patient age and month of sampling. The annual adjusted V/E was 2005/6, 67% (95% confidence intervals 41-82); 2006/7 55% (26-73) and 2007/8 67% (41-82); and in persons <65 years, 70% (57-78) and 65 years and over 46% (-17-75). Estimates derived separately for influenza A and B, for interval between illness onset and swab sample, for early and late winter periods, and according to viral load did not differ significantly in each comparison.

CONCLUSION:
We have demonstrated the potential of using routine management data to provide estimates of V/E in real-time. We recommend this approach to V/E measurement in the evaluation of national influenza vaccination programmes.

PMID: 19910645 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]

-
------
 
Re: J Epidemiol Community Health. Estimating Influenza vaccine effectiveness using routinely collected laboratory data.

my summary:

estimated adjusted vaccine effectiveness:
2005/6: 67%
2006/7: 55%
2007/8: 67%
<65y :70%
>64y :46%

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19910645
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom