• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

J Community Health . Associations Between Social Media Engagement and Vaccine Hesitancy

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
J Community Health


. 2022 Mar 25.
doi: 10.1007/s10900-022-01081-9. Online ahead of print.
Associations Between Social Media Engagement and Vaccine Hesitancy


Lola Al-Uqdah[SUP] 1 [/SUP], F Abron Franklin[SUP] 2 3 4 [/SUP], Chu-Chuan Chiu[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Brianna N Boyd[SUP] 2 [/SUP]



Affiliations

Abstract

There has been a surge in vaccine hesitancy following the Coronavirus pandemic. This study measured the prevalence of and identified factors associated with vaccine hesitancy and social media use. An online survey was administered (n = 1050) between May and July 2021. Chi-square tests were used to examine bivariate associations with vaccine hesitancy (partially vaccinated and unvaccinated participants). Logistic regression was used to identify associations between social media use and vaccine hesitancy. Chi-square tests showed women (69.7% vs 28.2% men, p[SUB]adjusted[/SUB] = .002), African American participants (52.3% vs 17.8% white, p[SUB]adjusted[/SUB] < .001), high school diploma (54.4% vs 38.6% college degree, p[SUB]adjusted[/SUB] < .001), political unaffiliated (15.8% vs 14.5% republican, p[SUB]adjusted[/SUB] < .001), Muslim (10.0% vs 0% Jewish, p[SUB]adjusted[/SUB] < .001), and never married/single (53.9% vs 17.0% married, p[SUB]adjusted[/SUB] < .001) were more likely to be vaccine hesitant. Controlling for all demographic variables (age, race, gender, and education), more frequent use of social media for reading news was associated with lower vaccine hesitancy (OR 0.35, 99% CI 0.20, 0.63, p < 0.001). However, using social media as a source of vaccine information without any other trusted source (health department, doctor, CDC,) was associated with higher odds of being vaccine hesitant (OR 2.00, 99% CI 1.15, 3.46, p = 0.001). People who use social media without referencing trusted sources may be particularly vulnerable to disinformation or vaccine hesitant persons are more likely exposed to non-trusted social media sites as their only information source.

Keywords: COVID-19 pandemic; Health disparity; Public health; Social media; Vaccine hesitancy.
 
Back
Top Bottom