• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

J Clin Virol. Validation of SARS-CoV-2 detection across multiple specimen types

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
J Clin Virol. 2020 May 13:104438. doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2020.104438. [Epub ahead of print]
Validation of SARS-CoV-2 detection across multiple specimen types.


Perchetti GA[SUP]1[/SUP], Nalla AK[SUP]1[/SUP], Huang ML[SUP]1[/SUP], Zhu H[SUP]1[/SUP], Wei Y[SUP]1[/SUP], Stensland L[SUP]1[/SUP], Loprieno MA[SUP]2[/SUP], Jerome KR[SUP]1,[/SUP][SUP]2[/SUP], Greninger AL[SUP]1,[/SUP][SUP]2[/SUP].

Author information




Abstract

Background:

Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has caused considerable disruption across the world, resulting in more than 235,000 deaths since December 2019. SARS-CoV-2 has a wide tropism and detection of the virus has been described in multiple specimen types, including various respiratory secretions, cerebrospinal fluid, and stool.
Objective:

To evaluate the accuracy and sensitivity of a laboratory modified CDCbased SARS-CoV-2 N1 and N2 assay across a range of sample types. Study Design We compared the matrix effect on the analytical sensitivity of SARS-CoV-2 detection by qRT-PCR in nasal swabs collected in viral transport medium (VTM), bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL), sputum, plasma, cerebral spinal fluid (CSF), stool, VTM, phosphate buffered saline (PBS), and Hanks' Balanced Salt Solution (HBSS). Initial limits of detection (LoD) were subsequently narrowed to confirm an LoD for each specimen type and target gene.
Results:

LoDs were established using a modified CDC-based laboratory developed test and ranged from a mean CT cut-off of 33.8-35.7 (10-20 copies/reaction) for the N1 gene target, and 34.0-36.2 (1-10 copies/reaction) for N2. Alternatives to VTM such as PBS and HBSS had comparable LoDs. The N2 gene target was found to be most sensitive in CSF.
Conclusion:

A modified CDC-based laboratory developed test is able to detect SARSCoV- 2 accurately with similar sensitivity across all sample types tested.
? 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.



KEYWORDS:

BAL; CSF; SARS-CoV-2; coronavirus; sensitivity; specimen type


PMID:32405257PMCID:PMC7219399DOI:10.1016/j.jcv.2020.104438
 
Back
Top