• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

J Clin Virol Clinical Evaluation of AusDiagnostics SARS-CoV-2 Multiplex Tandem PCR Assay

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
J Clin Virol


. 2020 May 19;128:104448.
doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2020.104448. Online ahead of print.
Clinical Evaluation of AusDiagnostics SARS-CoV-2 Multiplex Tandem PCR Assay


Lucy O Attwood[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Michelle J Francis[SUP] 2 [/SUP], John Hamblin[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Tony M Korman[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Julian Druce[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Maryza Graham[SUP] 6 [/SUP]



Affiliations
Free PMC article

Abstract

Background: In the context of the pandemic, the rapid emergency use authorisation of diagnostic assays for SARS-CoV-2 has meant there are few peer-reviewed published studies of clinical performance of commercial assays.
Aims: To evaluate the clinical performance of AusDiagnostics respiratory multiplex tandem PCR assay including SARS-CoV-2.
Methods: We reviewed the results following implementation of AusDiagnostics respiratory multiplex tandem PCR assay including SARS-CoV-2, and compared with an in-house RT-PCR assay at our State Reference Laboratory.
Results: Initial validation using AusDiagnostics coronavirus multiplex tandem PCR assay including SARS-CoV-2 demonstrated good concordance with the State Reference Laboratory. After implementing the AusDiagnostics respiratory multiplex tandem PCR assay including SARS-CoV-2, we tested 7839 samples. 127 samples in which SARS-CoV-2 was detected using the AusDiagnostics assay were referred for testing at the State Reference Laboratory, with concordant results in 118/127 (92.9%) of samples. After resolution of discrepancies, 125/127 (98.4%) of AusDiagnostics results were determined to be true positive results. Out of 7839 samples tested for SARS-CoV-2 during this period, only 2 tests (0.02%) were indeterminate results.
Conclusion: The AusDiagnostics respiratory MT-PCR assay is a reliable assay for detection of SARS-CoV-2.

Keywords: COVID-19; Coronavirus; Diagnosis; MT-PCR; SARS-CoV-2.
 
Back
Top Bottom