tetano
Editor, Senior Moderator
J Clin Pharmacol
. 2022 Nov 18.
doi: 10.1002/jcph.2178. Online ahead of print.
Ivermectin role in the prevention of COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Gong-Yi Hu[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Chun-An Liang[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Pei-Chin Lin[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Chih-Yang Lin[SUP] 4 [/SUP]
Affiliations
Abstract
This systematic review was performed to determine the population that benefited from prophylactic ivermectin. Seven databases of health-related studies were searched for eligible trials without language restrictions. Randomized controlled trials (RCT) and cohort studies investigating ivermectin for coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) prevention were included. Data were pooled using a random-effects model, and subgroups were analyzed by study type and the pre- or post-exposure population. The certainty of the evidence was determined by the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. Furthermore, four RCTs and four cohort studies with a moderate to high risk of bias were included in the analysis. The prophylactic use of ivermectin significantly decreased the overall incidence of COVID-19 (odds ratio [OR], 0.26; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.16-0.44). Nevertheless, the positive result was not supported by the RCT. Ivermectin was associated with a lower risk of COVID-19 (OR, 0.22; 95% CI, 0.12-0.40) in the pre-exposure population, whereas no protective effect was observed in the post-exposure population (OR, 0.39; 95% CI, 0.09-1.67). In summary, prophylactic ivermectin did not prevent COVID-19 in the post-exposure population. Although the protective effect of ivermectin was shown in the overall and pre-exposure populations, the results were unreliable owing to poor-quality evidence. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Keywords: COVID-19; ivermectin; meta-analysis; post-exposure; prevention; systematic review.
. 2022 Nov 18.
doi: 10.1002/jcph.2178. Online ahead of print.
Ivermectin role in the prevention of COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Gong-Yi Hu[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Chun-An Liang[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Pei-Chin Lin[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Chih-Yang Lin[SUP] 4 [/SUP]
Affiliations
- PMID: 36399336
- DOI: 10.1002/jcph.2178
Abstract
This systematic review was performed to determine the population that benefited from prophylactic ivermectin. Seven databases of health-related studies were searched for eligible trials without language restrictions. Randomized controlled trials (RCT) and cohort studies investigating ivermectin for coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) prevention were included. Data were pooled using a random-effects model, and subgroups were analyzed by study type and the pre- or post-exposure population. The certainty of the evidence was determined by the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. Furthermore, four RCTs and four cohort studies with a moderate to high risk of bias were included in the analysis. The prophylactic use of ivermectin significantly decreased the overall incidence of COVID-19 (odds ratio [OR], 0.26; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.16-0.44). Nevertheless, the positive result was not supported by the RCT. Ivermectin was associated with a lower risk of COVID-19 (OR, 0.22; 95% CI, 0.12-0.40) in the pre-exposure population, whereas no protective effect was observed in the post-exposure population (OR, 0.39; 95% CI, 0.09-1.67). In summary, prophylactic ivermectin did not prevent COVID-19 in the post-exposure population. Although the protective effect of ivermectin was shown in the overall and pre-exposure populations, the results were unreliable owing to poor-quality evidence. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Keywords: COVID-19; ivermectin; meta-analysis; post-exposure; prevention; systematic review.