tetano
Editor, Senior Moderator
J Clin Microbiol
. 2020 Aug 12;JCM.01695-20.
doi: 10.1128/JCM.01695-20. Online ahead of print.
Challenges and Controversies Related to Testing for COVID-19
Matthew J Binnicker[SUP] 1 [/SUP]
Affiliations
Abstract
The coronavirus disease (COVID)-19 pandemic has placed the clinical laboratory and testing for SARS-CoV-2 front-and-center in the worldwide discussion of how to end the outbreak. Clinical laboratories have responded by developing, validating and implementing a variety of molecular and serologic assays to test for SARS-CoV-2 infection. This has played an essential role in identifying cases, informing isolation decisions and helping to curb the spread of disease. However, as the demand for COVID-19 testing has increased, laboratory professionals have faced a growing list of challenges, uncertainties and, in some situations, controversy, as they have attempted to balance the need for increasing test capacity with maintaining a high-quality laboratory operation. The emergence of this new viral pathogen has raised unique diagnostic questions for which there have not always been straightforward answers. In this commentary, the author addresses several areas of current debate, including 1) the role of molecular assays in defining the duration of isolation/quarantine, 2) whether the PCR cycle threshold value should be included on patient reports, 3) if specimen pooling and testing by research staff represent acceptable solutions to expand screening, and 4) whether testing a large percentage of the population is feasible and represents a viable strategy to end the pandemic.
. 2020 Aug 12;JCM.01695-20.
doi: 10.1128/JCM.01695-20. Online ahead of print.
Challenges and Controversies Related to Testing for COVID-19
Matthew J Binnicker[SUP] 1 [/SUP]
Affiliations
- PMID: 32817231
- DOI: 10.1128/JCM.01695-20
Abstract
The coronavirus disease (COVID)-19 pandemic has placed the clinical laboratory and testing for SARS-CoV-2 front-and-center in the worldwide discussion of how to end the outbreak. Clinical laboratories have responded by developing, validating and implementing a variety of molecular and serologic assays to test for SARS-CoV-2 infection. This has played an essential role in identifying cases, informing isolation decisions and helping to curb the spread of disease. However, as the demand for COVID-19 testing has increased, laboratory professionals have faced a growing list of challenges, uncertainties and, in some situations, controversy, as they have attempted to balance the need for increasing test capacity with maintaining a high-quality laboratory operation. The emergence of this new viral pathogen has raised unique diagnostic questions for which there have not always been straightforward answers. In this commentary, the author addresses several areas of current debate, including 1) the role of molecular assays in defining the duration of isolation/quarantine, 2) whether the PCR cycle threshold value should be included on patient reports, 3) if specimen pooling and testing by research staff represent acceptable solutions to expand screening, and 4) whether testing a large percentage of the population is feasible and represents a viable strategy to end the pandemic.