tetano
Editor, Senior Moderator
J Clin Med
. 2022 Oct 22;11(21):6237.
doi: 10.3390/jcm11216237.
Respiratory Physiology of COVID-19 and Influenza Associated Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome
Niklas Kronibus[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP], Frederik Seiler[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP], Guy Danziger[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP], Ralf M Muellenbach[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Christian Reyher[SUP] 3 [/SUP], André P Becker[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP], Maren Kamphorst[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP], Torben M Rixecker[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP], Carlos Metz[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP], Robert Bals[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP], Philipp M Lepper[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP], Sebastian Mang[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP]
Affiliations
Abstract
Background: There is ongoing debate whether lung physiology of COVID-19-associated acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) differs from ARDS of other origin. Objective: The aim of this study was to analyze and compare how critically ill patients with COVID-19 and Influenza A or B were ventilated in our tertiary care center with or without extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). We ask if acute lung failure due to COVID-19 requires different intensive care management compared to conventional ARDS. Methods: 25 patients with COVID-19-associated ARDS were matched to a cohort of 25 Influenza patients treated in our center from 2011 to 2021. Subgroup analysis addressed whether patients on ECMO received different mechanical ventilation than patients without extracorporeal support. Results: Compared to Influenza-associated ARDS, COVID-19 patients had higher ventilatory system compliance (40.7 mL/mbar [31.8-46.7 mL/mbar] vs. 31.4 mL/mbar [13.7-42.8 mL/mbar], p = 0.198), higher ventilatory ratio (1.57 [1.31-1.84] vs. 0.91 [0.44-1.38], p = 0.006) and higher minute ventilation at the time of intubation (mean minute ventilation 10.7 L/min [7.2-12.2 L/min] for COVID-19 vs. 6.0 L/min [2.5-10.1 L/min] for Influenza, p = 0.013). There were no measurable differences in P/F ratio, positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) and driving pressures (ΔP). Respiratory system compliance deteriorated considerably in COVID-19 patients on ECMO during 2 weeks of mechanical ventilation (C[SUB]rs[/SUB], mean decrease over 2 weeks -23.87 mL/mbar ± 32.94 mL/mbar, p = 0.037) but not in ventilated Influenza patients on ECMO and less so in ventilated COVID-19 patients without ECMO. For COVID-19 patients, low driving pressures on ECMO were strongly correlated to a decline in compliance after 2 weeks (Pearson's R 0.80, p = 0.058). Overall mortality was insignificantly lower for COVID-19 patients compared to Influenza patients (40% vs. 48%, p = 0.31). Outcome was insignificantly worse for patients requiring veno-venous ECMO in both groups (50% mortality for COVID-19 on ECMO vs. 27% without ECMO, p = 0.30/56% vs. 34% mortality for Influenza A/B with and without ECMO, p = 0.31). Conclusion: The pathophysiology of early COVID-19-associated ARDS differs from Influenza-associated acute lung failure by sustained respiratory mechanics during the early phase of ventilation. We question whether intubated COVID-19 patients on ECMO benefit from extremely low driving pressures, as this appears to accelerate derecruitment and consecutive loss of ventilatory system compliance.
Keywords: acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS); coronavirus-disease 2019 (COVID-19); extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO); influenza A/B; mechanical ventilation.
. 2022 Oct 22;11(21):6237.
doi: 10.3390/jcm11216237.
Respiratory Physiology of COVID-19 and Influenza Associated Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome
Niklas Kronibus[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP], Frederik Seiler[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP], Guy Danziger[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP], Ralf M Muellenbach[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Christian Reyher[SUP] 3 [/SUP], André P Becker[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP], Maren Kamphorst[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP], Torben M Rixecker[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP], Carlos Metz[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP], Robert Bals[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP], Philipp M Lepper[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP], Sebastian Mang[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP]
Affiliations
- PMID: 36362465
- DOI: 10.3390/jcm11216237
Abstract
Background: There is ongoing debate whether lung physiology of COVID-19-associated acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) differs from ARDS of other origin. Objective: The aim of this study was to analyze and compare how critically ill patients with COVID-19 and Influenza A or B were ventilated in our tertiary care center with or without extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). We ask if acute lung failure due to COVID-19 requires different intensive care management compared to conventional ARDS. Methods: 25 patients with COVID-19-associated ARDS were matched to a cohort of 25 Influenza patients treated in our center from 2011 to 2021. Subgroup analysis addressed whether patients on ECMO received different mechanical ventilation than patients without extracorporeal support. Results: Compared to Influenza-associated ARDS, COVID-19 patients had higher ventilatory system compliance (40.7 mL/mbar [31.8-46.7 mL/mbar] vs. 31.4 mL/mbar [13.7-42.8 mL/mbar], p = 0.198), higher ventilatory ratio (1.57 [1.31-1.84] vs. 0.91 [0.44-1.38], p = 0.006) and higher minute ventilation at the time of intubation (mean minute ventilation 10.7 L/min [7.2-12.2 L/min] for COVID-19 vs. 6.0 L/min [2.5-10.1 L/min] for Influenza, p = 0.013). There were no measurable differences in P/F ratio, positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) and driving pressures (ΔP). Respiratory system compliance deteriorated considerably in COVID-19 patients on ECMO during 2 weeks of mechanical ventilation (C[SUB]rs[/SUB], mean decrease over 2 weeks -23.87 mL/mbar ± 32.94 mL/mbar, p = 0.037) but not in ventilated Influenza patients on ECMO and less so in ventilated COVID-19 patients without ECMO. For COVID-19 patients, low driving pressures on ECMO were strongly correlated to a decline in compliance after 2 weeks (Pearson's R 0.80, p = 0.058). Overall mortality was insignificantly lower for COVID-19 patients compared to Influenza patients (40% vs. 48%, p = 0.31). Outcome was insignificantly worse for patients requiring veno-venous ECMO in both groups (50% mortality for COVID-19 on ECMO vs. 27% without ECMO, p = 0.30/56% vs. 34% mortality for Influenza A/B with and without ECMO, p = 0.31). Conclusion: The pathophysiology of early COVID-19-associated ARDS differs from Influenza-associated acute lung failure by sustained respiratory mechanics during the early phase of ventilation. We question whether intubated COVID-19 patients on ECMO benefit from extremely low driving pressures, as this appears to accelerate derecruitment and consecutive loss of ventilatory system compliance.
Keywords: acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS); coronavirus-disease 2019 (COVID-19); extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO); influenza A/B; mechanical ventilation.