• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

J Clin Med . Outcomes of COVID-19 Patients with Severe Hypoxemic Acute Respiratory Failure: Non-Invasive Ventilation vs. Straight Intubation-A Prop

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
J Clin Med


. 2022 Oct 14;11(20):6063.
doi: 10.3390/jcm11206063.
Outcomes of COVID-19 Patients with Severe Hypoxemic Acute Respiratory Failure: Non-Invasive Ventilation vs. Straight Intubation-A Propensity Score-Matched Multicenter Cohort Study


Laura Pasin[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Dario Gregori[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Tommaso Pettenuzzo[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Alessandro De Cassai[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Annalisa Boscolo[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Nicolò Sella[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Giulia Lorenzoni[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Federico Geraldini[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Elisa Pistollato[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Vito Marco Ranieri[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Giovanni Landoni[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Paolo Rosi[SUP] 6 [/SUP], Paolo Navalesi[SUP] 1 3 [/SUP], Covid-Veneto Icu Network



Affiliations

Abstract

The best timing for endotracheal intubation in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) hypoxemic acute respiratory failure (hARF) remains debated. Aim of this study is to compare the outcomes of COVID-19 patients with hARF receiving either a trial of non-invasive ventilation (NIV) or intubated with no prior attempt of NIV ("straight intubation"). All consecutive patients admitted to the 25 participating ICUs were included and divided in two groups: the "straight intubation" group and the "NIV" group. A propensity score matching was performed to correct for biases associated with the choice of the respiratory support. Primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes were length of mechanical ventilation, hospital stay and reintubation rate. A total of 704 COVID-19 patients were admitted to ICUs during the study period. After matching, 141 patients were included in each group. No clinically relevant difference at ICU admission was found between groups. In-hospital mortality was significantly lower in the NIV group (22.0% vs. 36.2%), with no significant difference in secondary endpoints. There was no significant mortality difference between patients who received straight intubation and those intubated after NIV failure. In COVID-19 patients with hARF it is worth and safe attempting a trial of NIV prior to intubation.

Keywords: SARS-CoV-2; mechanical ventilation; mortality; non-invasive ventilation.
 
Back
Top Bottom