• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

J Clin Immunol . Anaphylaxis to SARS-CoV-2 Vaccines in the Setting of a Nationwide Passive Epidemiological Surveillance Program

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
J Clin Immunol


. 2022 Aug 17.
doi: 10.1007/s10875-022-01350-1. Online ahead of print.
Anaphylaxis to SARS-CoV-2 Vaccines in the Setting of a Nationwide Passive Epidemiological Surveillance Program


Carla Toledo-Salinas[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Selma Cecilia Scheffler-Mendoza[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Lina Maria Castano-Jaramillo[SUP] 3 [/SUP], José Antonio Ortega-Martell[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Blanca Estela Del Rio-Navarro[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Ana María Santibáñez-Copado[SUP] 6 [/SUP], José Luis Díaz-Ortega[SUP] 6 [/SUP], Raúl Baptista-Rosas[SUP] 7 8 [/SUP], Paulina Sánchez-Novoa[SUP] 9 [/SUP], Miguel García-Grimshaw[SUP] 10 11 [/SUP], Sergio Iván Valdés-Ferrer[SUP] 10 12 [/SUP], Gustavo Reyes-Terán[SUP] 1 [/SUP], David Alejandro Mendoza-Hernández[SUP] 13 [/SUP]



Affiliations

Abstract

Background: Information on anaphylaxis among recipients of vaccines against the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) remains scarce.
Objective: To identify the observed incidence of anaphylaxis in recipients of different anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccines.
Methods: A nationwide observational study among recipients of 61,414,803 doses of seven different anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccines, describing the incidence and characteristics of adult patients (age ≥ 18 years) who developed anaphylaxis as an adverse event following immunization (AEFI) against SARS-CoV-2 vaccines between December 24, 2020, and October 15, 2021, in Mexico.
Results: Sixty-six patients developed anaphylaxis as an AEFI, for an overall observed incidence of 1.07 cases per 1,000,000 (95% CI 0.84-1.37) administered doses. Eighty-six percent of the patients were female, consistent with previous reports of AEFI to COVID-19 vaccines. mRNA-based vaccine recipients had the highest frequency of anaphylaxis, followed by adenovirus-vectored vaccines and inactivated virus recipients, with an observed incidence of 2.5, 0.7, and 0.2 cases per 1,000,000 doses administered, respectively. Only 46% of the patients received correct treatment with epinephrine as the first-line treatment through the appropriate route and dose. We detected one case of anaphylactic reaction-related death occurring 5 min following immunization with ChAdOx1 nCov-19 for a mortality rate of 1.5% among those who developed this AEFI.
Conclusions: In our population, anaphylactic reactions were infrequent. Our study provides further evidence supporting the security of these newly developed vaccines.

Keywords: Anaphylaxis; COVID-19 vaccines; SARS-CoV-2 vaccines; Vaccine anaphylaxis; Vaccine safety.
 
Back
Top Bottom