• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

J Card Surg . Coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) venovenous extracorporeal oxygenation: Single community hospital results and insights

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
J Card Surg


. 2022 Apr 19.
doi: 10.1111/jocs.16514. Online ahead of print.
Coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) venovenous extracorporeal oxygenation: Single community hospital results and insights


James Lee West[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Andrew Nutting[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Brock Daughtry[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Andrew M Frey[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Clara T Nicolas[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Rayan Saab[SUP] 1 [/SUP], David H Sibley[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Joshua Smith[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Ronald Roan[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Michael Crain[SUP] 1 [/SUP]



Affiliations

Abstract

Background: The role of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) for patients with refractory respiratory failure due to coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) is still unclear even now over a year into the pandemic. ECMO is becoming more commonplace even at smaller community hospitals. While the advantages of venovenous (VV) ECMO in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) from COVID-19 have not been fully determined, we believe the benefits outweighed the risks in our patient population. Here we describe all patients who underwent VV ECMO at our center.
Methods: All patients placed on ECMO at our center since the beginning of the pandemic, May 5, 2020, until February 20, 2021 were included in our study. All patients placed on ECMO during the time period described above were followed until discharge or death. The primary endpoint was in-hospital death. Secondary outcomes included discharge disposition, that is, whether patients were sent to a long-term acute care center (LTAC), inpatient rehabilitation, or went directly home.
Results: A total of 41 patients were placed on VV ECMO for refractory acute respiratory failure. Survival to discharge, the primary end point, was 63.4% (26/41). Inpatient mortality was 36.6% (15/41).
Conclusions: We show here that a successful high-volume VV ECMO program for ARDS is achievable at even a medium-size community hospital. We think our success can be replicated by most small- and medium-size community hospitals with cardiothoracic surgery programs and intensivist teams.

Keywords: COVID-19; ECMO; critical care.
 
Back
Top Bottom