tetano
Editor, Senior Moderator
J Appl Lab Med
. 2024 Sep 9:jfae095.
doi: 10.1093/jalm/jfae095. Online ahead of print. SARS-CoV-2 Variants May Affect Saliva RT-PCR Assay Sensitivity
Jason S Chwa[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP], Yunho Shin[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Yesun Lee[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Thomas Fabrizio[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Zion Congrave-Wilson[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Wesley A Cheng[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Jaycee Jumarang[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Minjun Kim[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Richard Webby[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Jeffrey M Bender[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Pia S Pannaraj[SUP] 3 [/SUP]
Affiliations
Background: Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) variants demonstrate predilection for different regions of the respiratory tract. While saliva-based reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) testing is a convenient, cost-effective alternative to nasopharyngeal swabs (NPS), few studies to date have investigated whether saliva sensitivity differs across variants of concern.
Methods: SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR was performed on paired NPS and saliva specimens collected from individuals with acute coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) symptoms or exposure to a COVID-19 household contact. Viral genome sequencing of NPS specimens and Los Angeles County surveillance data were used to determine the variant of infection. Saliva sensitivity was calculated using NPS-positive RT-PCR as the reference standard. Factors contributing to the likelihood of saliva SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR positivity were evaluated with univariate and multivariable analyses.
Results: Between June 2020 and December 2022, 548 saliva samples paired with SARS-CoV-2 positive NPS samples were tested by RT-PCR. Overall, saliva sensitivity for SARS-CoV-2 detection was 61.7% (95% CI, 57.6%-65.7%). Sensitivity was highest with Delta infection (79.6%) compared to pre-Delta (58.5%) and Omicron (61.5%) (P = 0.003 and 0.01, respectively). Saliva sensitivity was higher in symptomatic individuals across all variants compared to asymptomatic cases [pre-Delta 80.6% vs 48.3% (P < 0.001), Delta 100% vs 72.5% (P = 0.03), Omicron 78.7% vs 51.2% (P < 0.001)]. Infection with Delta, symptoms, and high NPS viral load were independently associated with 2.99-, 3.45-, and 4.0-fold higher odds of SARS-CoV-2 detection by saliva-based RT-PCR (P = 0.004, <0.001, and <0.001), respectively.
Conclusions: As new variants emerge, evaluating saliva-based testing approaches may be crucial to ensure effective virus detection.
. 2024 Sep 9:jfae095.
doi: 10.1093/jalm/jfae095. Online ahead of print. SARS-CoV-2 Variants May Affect Saliva RT-PCR Assay Sensitivity
Jason S Chwa[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP], Yunho Shin[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Yesun Lee[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Thomas Fabrizio[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Zion Congrave-Wilson[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Wesley A Cheng[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Jaycee Jumarang[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Minjun Kim[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Richard Webby[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Jeffrey M Bender[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Pia S Pannaraj[SUP] 3 [/SUP]
Affiliations
- PMID: 39246012
- DOI: 10.1093/jalm/jfae095
Background: Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) variants demonstrate predilection for different regions of the respiratory tract. While saliva-based reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) testing is a convenient, cost-effective alternative to nasopharyngeal swabs (NPS), few studies to date have investigated whether saliva sensitivity differs across variants of concern.
Methods: SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR was performed on paired NPS and saliva specimens collected from individuals with acute coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) symptoms or exposure to a COVID-19 household contact. Viral genome sequencing of NPS specimens and Los Angeles County surveillance data were used to determine the variant of infection. Saliva sensitivity was calculated using NPS-positive RT-PCR as the reference standard. Factors contributing to the likelihood of saliva SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR positivity were evaluated with univariate and multivariable analyses.
Results: Between June 2020 and December 2022, 548 saliva samples paired with SARS-CoV-2 positive NPS samples were tested by RT-PCR. Overall, saliva sensitivity for SARS-CoV-2 detection was 61.7% (95% CI, 57.6%-65.7%). Sensitivity was highest with Delta infection (79.6%) compared to pre-Delta (58.5%) and Omicron (61.5%) (P = 0.003 and 0.01, respectively). Saliva sensitivity was higher in symptomatic individuals across all variants compared to asymptomatic cases [pre-Delta 80.6% vs 48.3% (P < 0.001), Delta 100% vs 72.5% (P = 0.03), Omicron 78.7% vs 51.2% (P < 0.001)]. Infection with Delta, symptoms, and high NPS viral load were independently associated with 2.99-, 3.45-, and 4.0-fold higher odds of SARS-CoV-2 detection by saliva-based RT-PCR (P = 0.004, <0.001, and <0.001), respectively.
Conclusions: As new variants emerge, evaluating saliva-based testing approaches may be crucial to ensure effective virus detection.