tetano
Editor, Senior Moderator
J Am Heart Assoc
. 2020 Oct 1;e017297.
doi: 10.1161/JAHA.120.017297. Online ahead of print.
Renin-Angiotensin System Blockers and Adverse Outcomes of Influenza and Pneumonia: A Danish Cohort Study
Christian Fynbo Christiansen[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Uffe Heide-J?rgensen[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Thomas B?jer Rasmussen[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Jacob Bodilsen[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Ole Schmeltz S?gaard[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Michael Maeng[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Simon Tilma Vistisen[SUP] 5 6 [/SUP], Morten Schmidt[SUP] 1 4 7 [/SUP], Anton Potteg?rd[SUP] 8 [/SUP], Lars Christian Lund[SUP] 8 [/SUP], Mette Reilev[SUP] 8 [/SUP], Jesper Hallas[SUP] 8 [/SUP], Nanna Borup Johansen[SUP] 9 [/SUP], Nikolai Constantin Brun[SUP] 9 [/SUP], Henrik Toft S?rensen[SUP] 1 10 [/SUP], Reimar Wernich Thomsen[SUP] 1 [/SUP]
Affiliations
Abstract
Background Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACE-Is) and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) may worsen the prognosis of coronavirus disease 2019, but any association could be confounded by the cardiometabolic conditions indicating ACE-I/ARB use. We therefore examined the impact of ACE-Is/ARBs on respiratory tract infection outcomes. Methods and Results This cohort study included all adult patients hospitalized with influenza or pneumonia from 2005 to 2018 in Denmark using population-based medical databases. Thirty-day mortality and risk of admission to the intensive care unit in ACE-Is/ARBs users was compared with nonusers and with users of calcium channel blockers. We used propensity scores to handle confounding and computed propensity score-weighted risks, risk differences (RDs), and risk ratios (RRs). Of 568 019 patients hospitalized with influenza or pneumonia, 100 278 were ACE-I/ARB users and 37 961 were users of calcium channel blockers. In propensity score-weighted analyses, ACE-I/ARB users had marginally lower 30-day mortality than users of calcium channel blockers (13.9% versus 14.5%; RD, -0.6%; 95% CI, -1.0 to -0.1; RR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.93-0.99), and a lower risk of admission to the intensive care unit (8.0% versus 9.6%; RD, -1.6%; 95% CI, -2.0 to -1.2; RR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.80-0.87). Compared with nonusers, current ACE-I/ARB users had lower mortality (RD, -2.4%; 95% CI, -2.8 to -2.0; RR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.83-0.87), but similar risk of admission to the intensive care unit (RD, 0.4%; 95% CI, 0.0-0.7; RR, 1.04; 95% CI, 1.00-1.09). Conclusions Among patients with influenza or pneumonia, ACE-I/ARB users had no increased risk of admission to the intensive care unit and slightly reduced mortality after controlling for confounding.
Keywords: angiotensin receptor blockers; angiotensin‐converting enzyme inhibitor; cohort study; infectious disease; intensive care unit.
. 2020 Oct 1;e017297.
doi: 10.1161/JAHA.120.017297. Online ahead of print.
Renin-Angiotensin System Blockers and Adverse Outcomes of Influenza and Pneumonia: A Danish Cohort Study
Christian Fynbo Christiansen[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Uffe Heide-J?rgensen[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Thomas B?jer Rasmussen[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Jacob Bodilsen[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Ole Schmeltz S?gaard[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Michael Maeng[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Simon Tilma Vistisen[SUP] 5 6 [/SUP], Morten Schmidt[SUP] 1 4 7 [/SUP], Anton Potteg?rd[SUP] 8 [/SUP], Lars Christian Lund[SUP] 8 [/SUP], Mette Reilev[SUP] 8 [/SUP], Jesper Hallas[SUP] 8 [/SUP], Nanna Borup Johansen[SUP] 9 [/SUP], Nikolai Constantin Brun[SUP] 9 [/SUP], Henrik Toft S?rensen[SUP] 1 10 [/SUP], Reimar Wernich Thomsen[SUP] 1 [/SUP]
Affiliations
- PMID: 32998607
- DOI: 10.1161/JAHA.120.017297
Abstract
Background Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACE-Is) and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) may worsen the prognosis of coronavirus disease 2019, but any association could be confounded by the cardiometabolic conditions indicating ACE-I/ARB use. We therefore examined the impact of ACE-Is/ARBs on respiratory tract infection outcomes. Methods and Results This cohort study included all adult patients hospitalized with influenza or pneumonia from 2005 to 2018 in Denmark using population-based medical databases. Thirty-day mortality and risk of admission to the intensive care unit in ACE-Is/ARBs users was compared with nonusers and with users of calcium channel blockers. We used propensity scores to handle confounding and computed propensity score-weighted risks, risk differences (RDs), and risk ratios (RRs). Of 568 019 patients hospitalized with influenza or pneumonia, 100 278 were ACE-I/ARB users and 37 961 were users of calcium channel blockers. In propensity score-weighted analyses, ACE-I/ARB users had marginally lower 30-day mortality than users of calcium channel blockers (13.9% versus 14.5%; RD, -0.6%; 95% CI, -1.0 to -0.1; RR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.93-0.99), and a lower risk of admission to the intensive care unit (8.0% versus 9.6%; RD, -1.6%; 95% CI, -2.0 to -1.2; RR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.80-0.87). Compared with nonusers, current ACE-I/ARB users had lower mortality (RD, -2.4%; 95% CI, -2.8 to -2.0; RR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.83-0.87), but similar risk of admission to the intensive care unit (RD, 0.4%; 95% CI, 0.0-0.7; RR, 1.04; 95% CI, 1.00-1.09). Conclusions Among patients with influenza or pneumonia, ACE-I/ARB users had no increased risk of admission to the intensive care unit and slightly reduced mortality after controlling for confounding.
Keywords: angiotensin receptor blockers; angiotensin‐converting enzyme inhibitor; cohort study; infectious disease; intensive care unit.