• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

J Am Geriatr Soc. Coronavirus, ageism, and Twitter: An evaluation of tweets about older adults and COVID-19

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2020 Apr 27. doi: 10.1111/jgs.16508. [Epub ahead of print]
Coronavirus, ageism, and Twitter: An evaluation of tweets about older adults and COVID-19.


Jimenez-Sotomayor MR[SUP]1[/SUP], Gomez-Moreno C[SUP]2[/SUP], Soto-Perez-de-Celis E[SUP]3[/SUP].

Author information




Abstract

OBJECTIVES:

In March 2020, the World Health Organization declared coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) a pandemic. High morbidity and mortality rates of COVID-19 have been observed among older adults, and this has been widely reported in both mainstream and social media. The objective of this study was to analyze tweets related to COVID-19 and older adults, and to identify ageist content.
DESIGN AND SETTINGS:

We obtained a representative sample of original tweets posted between March 12 and March 21, 2020, containing the keywords "elderly", "older", and/or "boomer" plus the hashtags "#COVID19" and/or "#coronavirus".
MEASUREMENTS:

We identified the type of user and number of followers for each account. Tweets were classified by three raters as: 1) informative; 2) personal accounts; 3) personal opinions; 4) advice seeking; 5) jokes; and 6) miscellaneous. Potentially offensive content, as well as that downplaying the severity of COVID-19 because it mostly affects older adults, was identified.
RESULTS:

18,128 tweets were obtained, of which a random sample of 351 was analyzed. Most accounts (91.7%) belonged to individuals. The most common types of tweets were personal opinions (31.9%), followed by informative tweets (29.6%), jokes/ridicule (14.3%), and personal accounts (13.4%). Seventy-seven tweets (21.9%) likely intended to ridicule or offend someone, while 21.1% had content which implied that the life of older adults was less valuable, or downplayed the relevance of COVID-19.
CONCLUSIONS:

Most COVID-19 and older adults-related tweets contained personal opinions, personal accounts, and jokes. Almost a quarter of analyzed tweets had ageist or potentially offensive content towards older adults. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.



KEYWORDS:

Ageism; COVID-19; Geriatrics; Social media; Twitter Messaging


PMID:32338787DOI:10.1111/jgs.16508
 
Back
Top Bottom