• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

J Am Coll Radiol. Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) CT Findings: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
J Am Coll Radiol. 2020 Mar 25. pii: S1546-1440(20)30262-3. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2020.03.006. [Epub ahead of print]
Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) CT Findings: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.


Bao C[SUP]1[/SUP], Liu X[SUP]1[/SUP], Zhang H[SUP]1[/SUP], Li Y[SUP]2[/SUP], Liu J[SUP]3[/SUP].

Author information




Abstract

PURPOSE:

To date, considerable knowledge gaps remain regarding the chest CT imaging features of COVID-19. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of results from published studies to date to provide a summary of evidence on detection of COVID-19 by chest CT and the expected CT imaging manifestations.
METHODS:

Studies were identified by searching PubMed database for articles published between December 2019 and February 2020. Pooled CT positive rate of COVID-19 and pooled incidence of CT imaging findings were estimated using a random-effect model.
RESULTS:

A total of 13 studies met inclusion criteria. The pooled positive rate of the CT imaging was 89.76% and 90.35% when only including thin-section chest CT. Typical CT signs were ground glass opacities (83.31%), ground glass opacities with mixed consolidation (58.42%), adjacent pleura thickening (52.46%), interlobular septal thickening (48.46%), and air bronchograms (46.46%). Other CT signs included crazy paving pattern (14.81%), pleural effusion (5.88%), bronchiectasis (5.42%), pericardial effusion (4.55%), and lymphadenopathy (3.38%). The most anatomic distributions were bilateral lung infection (78.2%) and peripheral distribution (76.95%). The incidences were highest in the right lower lobe (87.21%), left lower lobe (81.41%), and bilateral lower lobes (65.22%). The right upper lobe (65.22%), right middle lobe (54.95%), and left upper lobe (69.43%) were also commonly involved. The incidence of bilateral upper lobes was 60.87%. A considerable proportion of patients had three or more lobes involved (70.81%).
CONCLUSIONS:

The detection of COVID-19 chest CT imaging is very high among symptomatic individuals at high risk, especially using thin-section chest CT. The most common CT features in patients affected by COVID-19 included ground glass opacities and consolidation involving the bilateral lungs in a peripheral distribution.
Copyright ? 2020 American College of Radiology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.



KEYWORDS:

COVID-19; CT imaging findings; ground glass opacities; meta-analysis; thin-section chest CT


PMID:32283052DOI:10.1016/j.jacr.2020.03.006
 
Back
Top