• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Is the Profit Driven Private Sector Best Choice for Critical Functions?

sharon sanders

Editor-in-Chief & President
This reminds me of the recent dilemma of only a few influenza vaccine producers in the world. What will be the supply chain problems, i.e. telecommunication satellite placement or access to the moon, when profit motivates innovation in space?

February 2, 2010

Canceled Moon Shot Pays for NASA Science Boost



by Yudhijit Bhattacharjee


By canceling NASA?s moon mission, launched by former President George W. Bush in 2004, the White House pays heed to a report delivered last fall by the Norm Augustine commission, which declared that the goal of returning American astronauts to the moon by 2020 was unviable without a major boost to NASA?s budget. Instead, the White House has proposed eliminating the Constellation program, a $3.5-billion-a-year initiative aimed at building rockets, spacecraft, and other systems for the moon mission.

Although the moon mission would be zeroed out under the Administration?s proposal, NASA?s overall budget would increase by $6 billion over the next 5 years. It would go from $18.7 billion in 2010 to $19 billion in 2011.

NASA officials argue that Constellation?s end marks a major change in the nation?s space policy that could in fact accelerate space exploration by freeing up money for science and the funding of new technologies for future space flight, which would be led by the private sector instead of the government. NASA officials say they will leverage corporate investments and international collaborations to chart a new course in space exploration. That includes putting up money to extend the life of the international space station beyond the current end date of 2015 to at least 2020.


more.....




http://blogs.sciencemag.org/scienceinsider/2010/02/canceled-moon-s.html
 
Back
Top Bottom