tetano
Editor, Senior Moderator
J Clin Virol. 2010 Nov 18. [Epub ahead of print]
Investigation of causes of oseltamivir chemoprophylaxis failures during influenza A (H1N1-2009) outbreaks.
Lee VJ, Yap J, Maurer-Stroh S, Lee RT, Eisenhaber F, Tay JK, Ting PJ, Loh JP, Wong CW, Tan BH, Koay ES, Kelly PM, Hibberd ML.
Biodefence Centre, Ministry of Defence, Singapore; Centre for Health Services Research, National University of Singapore, Singapore; Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, National University of Singapore, Singapore; National Center for Epidemiology and Population Health, Australian National University, Australia.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Antiviral post-exposure prophylaxis with oseltamivir has been used as a strategy in mitigating the Influenza A (H1N1-2009) pandemic. There have been few reports of well-documented prophylaxis failures and the reasons for failure.
OBJECTIVES: We report herein a series of 10 cases of prophylaxis failures and explore the reasons behind their prophylaxis failure.
STUDY DESIGN: In the early pandemic phase, the military employed oseltamivir post-exposure ring-prophylaxis of affected units. From June 22 to July 30, 2009, cases of laboratory-confirmed prophylaxis failures were identified. Nasopharyngeal swabs were collected and tested by PCR. Samples with sufficient RNA material were sent for whole genome sequencing, and screened for mutations that confer oseltamivir resistance, especially the H275Y mutation.
RESULTS: Ten cases of laboratory-confirmed prophylaxis failure were identified, with a mean age of 22.3 years. One case was asymptomatic; the remaining 9 had fever or cough but without severe complications. The mean duration of exposure before starting oseltamivir was 1.9 days (SD 0.9), while the mean duration of oseltamivir consumption before symptom onset was 1.9 days (SD 1.4). None of the samples had the H275Y mutation or other known mutations that confer resistance. From the whole genome sequencing, several mutations at the HA (T220S, E275V, T333A, D239G); PB2 (K660R, L607V, V292I); NS1 (F103S), and NP (W104G) gene segments were detected, but none of them were likely to result in anti-viral resistance.
CONCLUSIONS: Primary prophylaxis failures exhibited mild symptoms without complications; all did not have the H275Y mutation and were unlikely to result from other mutations.
Copyright ? 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
PMID: 21094080 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21094080
Investigation of causes of oseltamivir chemoprophylaxis failures during influenza A (H1N1-2009) outbreaks.
Lee VJ, Yap J, Maurer-Stroh S, Lee RT, Eisenhaber F, Tay JK, Ting PJ, Loh JP, Wong CW, Tan BH, Koay ES, Kelly PM, Hibberd ML.
Biodefence Centre, Ministry of Defence, Singapore; Centre for Health Services Research, National University of Singapore, Singapore; Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, National University of Singapore, Singapore; National Center for Epidemiology and Population Health, Australian National University, Australia.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Antiviral post-exposure prophylaxis with oseltamivir has been used as a strategy in mitigating the Influenza A (H1N1-2009) pandemic. There have been few reports of well-documented prophylaxis failures and the reasons for failure.
OBJECTIVES: We report herein a series of 10 cases of prophylaxis failures and explore the reasons behind their prophylaxis failure.
STUDY DESIGN: In the early pandemic phase, the military employed oseltamivir post-exposure ring-prophylaxis of affected units. From June 22 to July 30, 2009, cases of laboratory-confirmed prophylaxis failures were identified. Nasopharyngeal swabs were collected and tested by PCR. Samples with sufficient RNA material were sent for whole genome sequencing, and screened for mutations that confer oseltamivir resistance, especially the H275Y mutation.
RESULTS: Ten cases of laboratory-confirmed prophylaxis failure were identified, with a mean age of 22.3 years. One case was asymptomatic; the remaining 9 had fever or cough but without severe complications. The mean duration of exposure before starting oseltamivir was 1.9 days (SD 0.9), while the mean duration of oseltamivir consumption before symptom onset was 1.9 days (SD 1.4). None of the samples had the H275Y mutation or other known mutations that confer resistance. From the whole genome sequencing, several mutations at the HA (T220S, E275V, T333A, D239G); PB2 (K660R, L607V, V292I); NS1 (F103S), and NP (W104G) gene segments were detected, but none of them were likely to result in anti-viral resistance.
CONCLUSIONS: Primary prophylaxis failures exhibited mild symptoms without complications; all did not have the H275Y mutation and were unlikely to result from other mutations.
Copyright ? 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
PMID: 21094080 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21094080