• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Investigation of avian influenza infection in wild birds in Ismailia and Damietta cities, Egypt

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Vet World. 2017 Jun;10(6):695-701. doi: 10.14202/vetworld.2017.695-701. Epub 2017 Jun 25.
[h=1]Investigation of avian influenza infection in wild birds in Ismailia and Damietta cities, Egypt.[/h] Fadel HM[SUP]1[/SUP], Afifi R[SUP]2[/SUP].
[h=3]Author information[/h]

[h=3]Abstract[/h] [h=4]AIM:[/h] This study was carried out to monitor avian influenza (AI) infection in wild birds in Egypt.
[h=4]MATERIALS AND METHODS:[/h] A total of 135 wild birds were examined for the presence of H5, H7, and H9 hemagglutination inhibition antibodies. Organs and swab samples of 75 birds were screened by multiplex real-time reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RRT-PCR) to detect AI subtypes H5, H7, and H9 matrix genes.
[h=4]RESULTS:[/h] The highest seropositive result was recorded in cattle egrets (90.9%) followed by crows (88.6%), semi-captive pigeons (44.8%), and moorhens (39.1%). In cattle egrets, semi-captive pigeons and moorhens, H5 antibodies predominated. In crows, H9 antibodies predominated. Multiple infections with two or three virus subtypes were highest in crows (6/39, 15.4%) followed by cattle egrets (3/30, 10%) and moorhens' (1/9, 11.1%) positive samples. Multiplex RRT-PCR results revealed two positive samples in cattle egrets and moorhens.
[h=4]CONCLUSION:[/h] The results indicated high seropositive rates against AI virus subtypes H5 and H9 in the examined wild birds. Multiple infections with more than one AI virus (AIV) subtypes were detected in some birds. This requires a collaboration of efforts to monitor AIV infection in wild birds and implement suitable early intervention measures.


[h=4]KEYWORDS:[/h] avian influenza; hemagglutination inhibition; real-time reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction; wild birds

PMID: 28717324 PMCID: PMC5499089 DOI: 10.14202/vetworld.2017.695-701
 
Back
Top Bottom