Re: Interview with Dr. C.A. Nidom. Discussion Thread
It we'll be seen, than.
For now, it seems many (supposed 50%) mild/asimptomatic HighPath. bf., if the text was exact:
"Following this, Eramuslim discussed this case with bird flu observer and also a member Dr. of Molecular Biology at the University of Airlangga Surabaya, Dr. C.A Nidom, MS.
There is a chance that 70 percent of the people of Jakarta have the bird flu virus, so allegations have been made that the mass media is spreading this around town. Is this matter true? ('Have the bird flu virus, means have anti-bodies, IMHO ed.)
These allegations were issued after research and examinations were conducted on Jakarta society. I am confident that this is the same dangerous virus,
dangerous version = High, not LowP version
consequently I mentioned no less than 70 percent. Data was obtained from facts I found all these years in the areas of Tangerang and Jakarta.
The first facts that came this way, happened to be a big bird flu case, occurring in the year 2003 to Tangerang chickens. I also discovered the first virus that infected pigs also in Tangerang, later it infected people. That direct cluster case in Iwan Iswara was also in Tangerang. Later for several months the infection continued.
Later in March, 2006, I conducted tests against a virus that came from Tangerang, that would indicate the presence of a pocket of virus contagion that is spread between humans.
Then from where do you make the conclusion of 70 percent?
The important figures are not here. I have said that I am sure that a profound part of the Jakarta population Jakarta as well as Tangerang has this virus, because my guess is that this virus has spread between people whose numbers reach 50 percent, so my calculations may be less than 70 percent. But these are the calculation figures.
These days officials from the Health Department do not want to conduct surveillance for those in Jakarta to prove that the incidents in Jakarta and the Tangerang are not only because of contagion from birds."
It we'll be seen, than.
For now, it seems many (supposed 50%) mild/asimptomatic HighPath. bf., if the text was exact:
"Following this, Eramuslim discussed this case with bird flu observer and also a member Dr. of Molecular Biology at the University of Airlangga Surabaya, Dr. C.A Nidom, MS.
There is a chance that 70 percent of the people of Jakarta have the bird flu virus, so allegations have been made that the mass media is spreading this around town. Is this matter true? ('Have the bird flu virus, means have anti-bodies, IMHO ed.)
These allegations were issued after research and examinations were conducted on Jakarta society. I am confident that this is the same dangerous virus,
dangerous version = High, not LowP version
consequently I mentioned no less than 70 percent. Data was obtained from facts I found all these years in the areas of Tangerang and Jakarta.
The first facts that came this way, happened to be a big bird flu case, occurring in the year 2003 to Tangerang chickens. I also discovered the first virus that infected pigs also in Tangerang, later it infected people. That direct cluster case in Iwan Iswara was also in Tangerang. Later for several months the infection continued.
Later in March, 2006, I conducted tests against a virus that came from Tangerang, that would indicate the presence of a pocket of virus contagion that is spread between humans.
Then from where do you make the conclusion of 70 percent?
The important figures are not here. I have said that I am sure that a profound part of the Jakarta population Jakarta as well as Tangerang has this virus, because my guess is that this virus has spread between people whose numbers reach 50 percent, so my calculations may be less than 70 percent. But these are the calculation figures.
These days officials from the Health Department do not want to conduct surveillance for those in Jakarta to prove that the incidents in Jakarta and the Tangerang are not only because of contagion from birds."
