• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Int J Infect Dis . Specificity testing by point prevalence as a simple assessment strategy using the Roche Elecsys? Anti-SARS-CoV-2 immunoassay

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Int J Infect Dis


. 2021 Feb 9;S1201-9712(21)00110-7.
doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2021.02.024. Online ahead of print.
Specificity testing by point prevalence as a simple assessment strategy using the Roche Elecsys? Anti-SARS-CoV-2 immunoassay


Maximilian Kittel[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Peter Findeisen[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Maria-Christina Muth[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Margot Thiaucourt[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Catharina Gerhards[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Michael Neumaier[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Verena Haselmann[SUP] 3 [/SUP]



Affiliations
Free PMC article

Abstract

Background: The detection of antibodies against the novel coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 is mandatory for the diagnosis, retrospective assessment of disease progression, and correct evaluation of the current infection situation in the population. Many of these assays have been launched by various manufacturers. Unfortunately, the new FDA emergency use regulations have resulted in a situation where laboratories have to perform their own validation studies. Numerous of these labs do not have the biobank needed to carry the studies out.
Methods: In this paper, we introduce a method that allows institutions to quickly perform a verifiation study in a low-prevalence infection situation. As proof of concept, we used the Roche Elecsys Anti-SARS-CoV-2 ECLIA assay and an SAP-based hospital information system. The Shenzhen YHLO Biotech IgM and IgG assay targetting other surface patterns, was used as confirmatory test.
Results: The Roche assay demonstrated a limit of detection of 0.069 COI (cutoff index) and successfully passed the performance validation according to CLSI EP15-A3. The study population of 627 in-patients exhibited an age median of 64 years and approximately 13% of the group were under intensive care at the respective time point. All included patients were tested negative for SARS-CoV-2 infection by qRT-PCR (cobas 6800?, Roche, Mannheim, Germany). Only one false positive result was obtained, resulting in a specificity for the Roche Elecsys Anti-SARS-CoV-2 test of 99.84% and a negative predictive value of 99.98%.
Conclusions: The anonymized use of residual material enables quick evaluation of anti-SARS-CoV-2 immunoassays, as shown in this work with the Roche Elecsys assay. Comparison of the control population with economic data makes it possible to validate the sampling set and therefore to determine diagnostic specificity. Using the chosen approach, it was shown that the Roche test achieved very good results in terms of diagnostic specificity, reproducibility and limit of detection.

Keywords: COVID-19; Roche; anti-SARS-CoV-2; serological assay; validation; verification.
 
Back
Top Bottom