• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Int J Infect Dis . Randomized Immunogenicity Trial Comparing 2019-2020 Recombinant and Egg-Based Influenza Vaccines among Frequently Vaccinated Heal

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Int J Infect Dis


. 2024 Oct 10:107260.
doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2024.107260. Online ahead of print. Randomized Immunogenicity Trial Comparing 2019-2020 Recombinant and Egg-Based Influenza Vaccines among Frequently Vaccinated Healthcare Personnel in Israel

Ashley L Fowlkes[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Alon Peretz[SUP] 2 [/SUP], David Greenberg[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Avital Hirsch[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Emily T Martin[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Min Z Levine[SUP] 6 [/SUP], Laura Edwards[SUP] 7 [/SUP], Sarah Radke[SUP] 8 [/SUP], Adam S Lauring[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Jill M Ferdinands[SUP] 6 [/SUP], Chao Zhang[SUP] 6 [/SUP], Young M Yoo[SUP] 6 [/SUP], Jacob Dryer[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Gabriella Newes-Adeyi[SUP] 7 [/SUP], Eduardo Azziz-Baumgartner[SUP] 6 [/SUP], Alicia M Fry[SUP] 6 [/SUP], Arnold S Monto[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Ran Balicer[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Mark G Thompson[SUP] 6 [/SUP], Mark A Katz[SUP] 4 [/SUP]



Affiliations
Free article Abstract

Background: Trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine effectiveness was low in a prospective cohort of healthcare personnel (HCP) in Israel from 2016-2019. We conducted a randomized immunogenicity trial of quadrivalent recombinant influenza vaccine (RIV4) and standard-dose inactivated influenza vaccine (IIV4) among frequently and infrequently vaccinated previous cohort participants.
Methods: From October 2019 to January 2020, we enrolled and randomly allocated HCP from two Israeli hospitals to receive IIV4 or RIV4. Hemagglutination inhibition (HAI) antibody titers against 2019-2020 vaccine reference influenza viruses were compared between vaccine groups using geometric mean titer (GMT) ratios from sera collected one-month post-vaccination and by frequency of vaccination in the past 5 years (>2 versus ≤2).
Results: Among 415 HCP, the GMT ratio comparing RIV4 to IIV4 was 2.0 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.7-2.7) for A(H1N1)pdm09, 1.6 (95% CI: 1.3-1.9) for A(H3N2), 1.8 (95% CI: 1.4-2.2) for B(Yamagata), and 1.1 (95% CI: 0.9-1.4) for B(Victoria). Similarly, RIV4 elicited higher HAI titers than IIV4 against all 2019-2020 vaccine reference viruses except B(Victoria) among infrequently and frequently vaccinated HCP (lower bound of GMT ratio 95% CIs ≥1.0).
Conclusions: RIV4 had improved immunogenicity for influenza vaccine strains among both infrequent and frequent vaccinees compared to standard-dose IIV4.

Keywords: Flublok; Influenza vaccine; healthcare personnel; immunogenicity; recombinant.

 
Back
Top Bottom