• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Int J Infect Dis . Comparable Effectiveness of MF59®-Adjuvanted and High-Dose Quadrivalent Inactivated Influenza Vaccines for Prevention of Test-Con

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Int J Infect Dis


. 2025 Jul 12:107983.
doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2025.107983. Online ahead of print. Comparable Effectiveness of MF59®-Adjuvanted and High-Dose Quadrivalent Inactivated Influenza Vaccines for Prevention of Test-Confirmed Influenza During the 2022-2023 Influenza Season

Mahrukh Imran[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Benjamin Chastek[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Tim Bancroft[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Noah Webb[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Stephen I Pelton[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Mendel D M Haag[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Ian McGovern[SUP] 5 [/SUP]



Affiliations
Abstract

Objective: Adjuvanted and higher-dose influenza vaccines are recommended by the US Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) for adults ≥65 years. This study estimated the relative vaccine effectiveness (rVE) of adjuvanted quadrivalent influenza vaccine (aQIV) versus high-dose QIV (HD-QIV) in preventing test-confirmed influenza in US adults ≥65 years during the 2022-2023 season.
Methods: In a retrospective test-negative design, electronic health records and claims data from the Optum Market Clarity database were used to identify adults ≥65 years who received aQIV or HD-QIV and were tested for influenza associated with acute respiratory or febrile illness in any setting or during emergency department visits or inpatient admissions (ED/inpatient). A doubly robust model was used, combining inverse probability of treatment weighting and logistic regression.
Results: Of 4,228,481 adults ≥65 years who received aQIV or HD-QIV, 30,911 were tested for influenza and met selection criteria (2,361 cases; 28,550 controls). The rVE of aQIV vs. HD-QIV was -2.5% (95% CI, -13.4% to 7.4%) in any setting and 0.0% (95% CI, -15.9% to 13.7%) in ED/inpatient settings.
Conclusions: Similar to previous studies, aQIV and HD-QIV provided comparable protection against test-confirmed influenza in any setting, including ED/inpatient, aligning with ACIP and other recommendations for adults ≥65 years.

Keywords: adjuvanted influenza vaccine; high-dose influenza vaccine; older adults aged ≥65 years; real-world data; test-confirmed influenza, laboratory-confirmed influenza; test-negative design.

 
Back
Top Bottom