• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Int J Epidemiol . The effect of SARS-CoV-2 testing on healthcare-seeking behaviour at primary care level

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Int J Epidemiol


. 2026 Feb 18;55(2):dyag031.
doi: 10.1093/ije/dyag031.
The effect of SARS-CoV-2 testing on healthcare-seeking behaviour at primary care level

Cheyenne C E van Hagen[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Eric R A Vos[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Charlotte Lanièce Delaunay[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Hester E de Melker[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Esther Kissling[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Mirjam J Knol[SUP] 1 [/SUP]


Affiliations
Abstract

Background: Diagnostic self-testing for SARS-CoV-2 may lead to selection bias in test-negative case-control designs (TND) for COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness (VE) at the primary care level. We investigated whether SARS-CoV-2 self-testing among those with acute respiratory infection (ARI) after the acute pandemic phase was associated with primary care healthcare seeking in the general Dutch population.
Methods: We pooled questionnaire data from three study rounds (June 2022, November 2022, and April 2023) of the nationwide PIENTER Corona cohort study. Among 3152 participants aged ≥18 years, we selected the first self-reported ARI episode with cough, sore throat, dyspnoea, and/or coryza since March 2022. We performed log-binomial regression analyses adjusted for age, sex, education, and comorbidities to assess the associations between COVID-19 vaccination, SARS-CoV-2 self-testing, and general practitioner (GP) consultation, and between GP consultation and the prior self-test result.
Results: Vaccinated (vs. unvaccinated) participants with an ARI episode more often self-tested [adjusted risk ratio (RR) 1.13, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.04-1.27]. Vaccination (RR 0.78, 95% CI 0.48-1.44) and the self-test result overall (RR 0.86, 95% CI 0.69-1.08) were both not associated with GP consultation. However, with point estimates in opposite directions, vaccinated individuals seemed less likely (RR 0.86, 95% CI 0.68-1.08) and unvaccinated seemed more likely (RR 1.57, 95% CI 0.36-6.28) to consult a GP after a positive self-test.
Conclusion: Findings from this Dutch-population-based cohort suggest that GP consultations between March 2022 and May 2023 may have differed by self-test result and vaccination status, indicating that selection bias in the TND COVID-19 VE estimates from testing before GP consultation could be a valid concern. More research in various settings is needed.

Keywords: SARS-CoV-2; healthcare-seeking behaviour; prospective cohort study; self-test; test-negative study design; vaccine effectiveness.

 
Back
Top Bottom