tetano
Editor, Senior Moderator
Int J Environ Res Public Health
. 2020 Dec 16;17(24):E9421.
doi: 10.3390/ijerph17249421.
Comparing the Scope and Efficacy of COVID-19 Response Strategies in 16 Countries: An Overview
Liudmila Rozanova[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP], Alexander Temerev[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Antoine Flahault[SUP] 1 2 3 4 [/SUP]
Affiliations
Abstract
This article synthesizes the results of case studies on the development of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic and control measures by governments in 16 countries. When this work was conducted, only 6 months had passed since the pandemic began, and only 4 months since the first events were recognized outside of China. It was too early to draw firm conclusions about the effectiveness of measures in each of the selected countries; however, the authors present some efforts to identify and classify response and containment measures, country-by-country, for future comparison and analysis. There is a significant variety of policy tools and response measures employed in different countries, and while it is still hard to directly compare the different approaches based on their efficacy, it will definitely provide many inputs for the future data analysis efforts.
Keywords: COVID-19; case studies; comparison; coronavirus; epidemic response; public health.
. 2020 Dec 16;17(24):E9421.
doi: 10.3390/ijerph17249421.
Comparing the Scope and Efficacy of COVID-19 Response Strategies in 16 Countries: An Overview
Liudmila Rozanova[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP], Alexander Temerev[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Antoine Flahault[SUP] 1 2 3 4 [/SUP]
Affiliations
- PMID: 33339119
- DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17249421
Abstract
This article synthesizes the results of case studies on the development of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic and control measures by governments in 16 countries. When this work was conducted, only 6 months had passed since the pandemic began, and only 4 months since the first events were recognized outside of China. It was too early to draw firm conclusions about the effectiveness of measures in each of the selected countries; however, the authors present some efforts to identify and classify response and containment measures, country-by-country, for future comparison and analysis. There is a significant variety of policy tools and response measures employed in different countries, and while it is still hard to directly compare the different approaches based on their efficacy, it will definitely provide many inputs for the future data analysis efforts.
Keywords: COVID-19; case studies; comparison; coronavirus; epidemic response; public health.