• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol . Hidden SARS-CoV-2 Omicron Infections in Young Children: What Routine Tests Do Not Tell

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol


. 2026 Mar 3;30(1):1-6.
doi: 10.1055/s-0045-1809649. eCollection 2026 Jan.
Hidden SARS-CoV-2 Omicron Infections in Young Children: What Routine Tests Do Not Tell

Stijn Bogaert[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Hannah Lukasik[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Panagiotis Georgiou[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Philipp Gude[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Sonja Farajzadeh[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Stefan Dazert[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Olaf Michel[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Konstantin van Ackeren[SUP] 6 [/SUP], Stefan Volkenstein[SUP] 2 [/SUP]


Affiliations
Abstract

Introduction: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic caused a global emergency. Screening protocols vary regarding the epidemiological situation and the dominant virus variant. Implementing these protocols can be particularly challenging in young children.
Objective: To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of routine polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing in small children. Furthermore, hidden severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) Omicron infections, missed by routine PCR testing, were intraoperatively analyzed, and multiple testing methods were compared.
Methods: The present prospective cohort study was performed between March and May 2022. All children aged ≤ 6 years who were admitted for adenoidectomy and/or tonsillotomy to the Department of Otorhinolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery of the Saint Elisabeth Hospital, in Bochum, Germany, were included. Routine PCR swabs were performed ≤ 24 hours before surgery. Intraoperatively, rapid antigen tests, separate naso- and oropharyngeal PCR swabs, adenoid and/or tonsillar tissue for PCR analysis, and serological tests were collected.
Results: We included 55 children with negative preoperative PCR tests. Intraoperatively, SARS-CoV-2 particles were detected in 51% of the sample. Among children without a history of SARS-CoV-2 infection within 90 days before surgery, the prevalence was 43%. Compared with the PCR results regarding tissue, the preoperative PCR screening had a sensitivity of 20%, and, in the intraoperative PCR screening, the optimally performed swabs had a sensitivity of 79%. In total, 29% of the positive cases had a cycle threshold (Ct) value < 30. Nasopharyngeal PCR tests detected significantly more SARS-CoV-2 infections than oropharyngeal swabs.
Conclusion: Routine PCR tests in infants may present a high rate of false-negative results and a low sensitivity. These findings question preoperative screening protocols that include testing asymptomatic children who have recovered from a recent SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Keywords: COVID-19 testing; clinical practice guideline; lymphoid tissue; pediatrics; predictive value of tests.

 
Back
Top