• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Inhibition by caffeic acid of the influenza A virus multiplication in vitro

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Int J Mol Med. 2014 Jul 22. doi: 10.3892/ijmm.2014.1859. [Epub ahead of print]
Inhibition by caffeic acid of the influenza A virus multiplication in vitro.
Utsunomiya H1, Ichinose M1, Ikeda K2, Uozaki M3, Morishita J4, Kuwahara T4, Koyama AH3, Yamasaki H3.
Author information
Abstract

Caffeic acid has been shown to inhibit the multiplication of influenza A virus in vitro, whereas caffeine, quinic acid and chlorogenic acid do not. Caffeic acid has also been shown to have antiviral activity against herpes simplex virus (DNA virus) and polio virus (RNA virus). In the present study, a comparison of the one-step growth curve of the influenza virus in the presence of caffeic acid with that in the absence of the reagent showed that an eclipse period of the virus multiplication in the infected cells was not affected by the reagent, while the progeny virus yield was markedly decreased in the presence of caffeic acid. In additional experiments, it was found that the addition of caffeic acid at an early time point post-infection (within 3 h post-infection) was mandatory for extensive antiviral activity, suggesting that a major target of the reagent exists in the early stages of infection. Simultaneously with the decrease in the progeny virus yield, both the virus-induced cytopathic effects and apoptotic nuclear fragmentation were markedly suppressed by the reagent, suggesting that caffeic acid suppresses, at least temporally, the degeneration of the virus-infected cells and that the observed antiviral activity is likely not the secondary result of the cytotoxic effects of the reagent. These results suggest the potential pharmacological use of caffeic acid or its derivatives as an antiviral drug against influenza A virus.

PMID:
25050906
[PubMed - as supplied by publisher]

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25050906
 
Back
Top Bottom