• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Influenza vaccine effectiveness: best practice and current limitations of the screening method and their implications for the clinic

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Expert Rev Vaccines. 2014 Jun 19:1-10. [Epub ahead of print]
Influenza vaccine effectiveness: best practice and current limitations of the screening method and their implications for the clinic.
Minodier L1, Blanchon T, Souty C, Turbelin C, Leccia F, Varesi L, Falchi A.
Author information
Abstract

Is there a role for the screening method in estimating influenza vaccine effectiveness (VE)? The answer is yes, but the simplicity of the method used has raised concerns about its validity, and several cautions should be noted. The screening method provides an approximation of influenza VE by comparing the proportion of cases vaccinated (PCV) with the proportion of persons vaccinated (PPV) in the general population. This method has an important disadvantage: VE estimation could be inaccurate if the values for PCV and PPV are drawn from different populations, but it has an important strength, compared with other observational studies, in providing an early indication of VE in the field. Thus, when an infrastructure, such as routine surveillance, is in place to collect robust PCV values, and PPV can be obtained from routine vaccine uptake monitoring systems, the screening method can provide early estimates of influenza VE in target groups.
KEYWORDS:

confounding factor; influenza-like illness; outcome measure; screening method; specificity; surveillance; target group; vaccine coverage; vaccine effectiveness; vaccine efficacy

PMID:
24946796
[PubMed - as supplied by publisher]

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24946796
 
Back
Top Bottom