• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Influenza vaccination responses: Evaluating impact of repeat vaccination among health care workers

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Vaccine. 2017 Apr 3. pii: S0264-410X(17)30390-0. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2017.03.063. [Epub ahead of print]
[h=1]Influenza vaccination responses: Evaluating impact of repeat vaccination among health care workers.[/h] Leung VK[SUP]1[/SUP], Carolan LA[SUP]2[/SUP], Worth LJ[SUP]3[/SUP], Harper SA[SUP]3[/SUP], Peck H[SUP]2[/SUP], Tilmanis D[SUP]2[/SUP], Laurie KL[SUP]2[/SUP], Slavin MA[SUP]3[/SUP], Sullivan SG[SUP]4[/SUP].
[h=3]Author information[/h]

[h=3]Abstract[/h] [h=4]OBJECTIVE:[/h] To compare the antibody response to influenza between health care workers (HCWs) who have received multiple vaccinations (high vaccination group) and those who have received fewer vaccinations (low vaccination group).
[h=4]DESIGN:[/h] Prospective serosurvey.
[h=4]SETTING:[/h] Tertiary referral hospital.
[h=4]PARTICIPANTS:[/h] Healthcare workers.
[h=4]METHODS:[/h] Healthcare workers were vaccinated with the 2015 southern hemisphere trivalent influenza vaccine. Influenza antibody titres were measured pre-vaccination, 21-28days post-vaccination and 6months post-vaccination. Antibody titres were measured using the haemagglutination inhibition assay. Levels of seropositivity and estimated geometric mean titres were calculated.
[h=4]RESULTS:[/h] Of the 202 HCWs enrolled, 182 completed the study (143 high vaccination and 39 low vaccination). Both vaccination groups demonstrated increases in post-vaccination geometric mean titres, with greater gains in the low vaccination group. Seropositivity remained high in both high and low vaccination groups post-vaccination. The highest fold rise was observed among HCWs in the low vaccination group against the H3N2 component of the vaccine.
[h=4]CONCLUSIONS:[/h] Both high and low vaccination groups in our study demonstrated protective antibody titres post-vaccination. The findings from the current study are suggestive of decreased serological response among highly vaccinated HCWs. More studies with larger sample sizes and a greater number of people in the vaccine-na?ve and once-vaccinated groups are required to confirm or refute these findings before making any policy changes.
Copyright ? 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.


[h=4]KEYWORDS:[/h] Antibody; Focus reduction assay; Healthcare worker; Hemagglutination inhibition assay; Immunogenicity; Influenza vaccine

PMID: 28385605 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2017.03.063
 
Back
Top Bottom