• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Influenza Other Respir Viruses . Low-pathogenicity influenza viruses replicate differently in laughing gulls and mallards

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Influenza Other Respir Viruses


. 2021 Jun 10.
doi: 10.1111/irv.12878. Online ahead of print.
Low-pathogenicity influenza viruses replicate differently in laughing gulls and mallards


Miria F Criado[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Kira A Moresco[SUP] 1 [/SUP], David E Stallknecht[SUP] 2 [/SUP], David E Swayne[SUP] 1 [/SUP]



Affiliations
Free article

Abstract

Wild aquatic birds are natural reservoirs of low-pathogenicity avian influenza viruses (LPAIVs). Laughing gulls inoculated with four gull-origin LPAIVs (H7N3, H6N4, H3N8, and H2N3) had a predominate respiratory infection. By contrast, mallards inoculated with two mallard-origin LPAIVs (H5N6 and H4N8) became infected and had similar virus titers in oropharyngeal (OP) and cloacal (CL) swabs. The trend toward predominate OP shedding in gulls suggest a greater role of direct bird transmission in maintenance, whereas mallards shedding suggests importance of fecal-oral transmission through water contamination. Additional infectivity and pathogenesis studies are needed to confirm this replication difference for LPAI viruses in gulls.

Keywords: avian influenza; laughing gulls; low-pathogenicity avian influenza; mallard; pathogenesis; pathogenicity; wild birds.
 
Back
Top Bottom