• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Influenza Other Respir Viruses . Longitudinal SARS-CoV-2 Antibody Response in Healthcare Workers: Benefit of Prior Infection and Heterologous Boost

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Influenza Other Respir Viruses


. 2026 Jan;20(1):e70202.
doi: 10.1111/irv.70202. Longitudinal SARS-CoV-2 Antibody Response in Healthcare Workers: Benefit of Prior Infection and Heterologous Boosting on Anti-Spike IgG Immunity

Els Van Nedervelde[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP], Ellen Vancutsem[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Deborah De Geyter[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Diederik De Cock[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Rhea Buttiens[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Thessa Laeremans[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Joeri L Aerts[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Sabine D Allard[SUP] 1 [/SUP]



Affiliations
Abstract

Background and objectives: Different COVID-19 vaccine platforms elicit variable immune responses, influenced by prior infection and booster vaccination. We aimed to compare the humoral immune responses elicited by mRNA and adenoviral vector (Ad-vector) COVID-19 vaccines in hospital employees and to assess the possible impact of prior SARS-CoV-2 infection on these responses.
Methods: We performed a prospective observational cohort study by recruiting employees of the Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel who were vaccinated with an mRNA or Ad-vector vaccine. We assessed anti-spike (S) IgG and neutralising capacity at 1, 6 and 12 months (post-mRNA booster). Anti-S and anti-NCP IgG were measured by chemiluminescent microparticle immunoassay, and neutralising capacity was assessed using Genscript's cPASS. Non-parametric group comparisons used the Mann-Whitney U test, complemented by multiple linear regression.
Results: Following RVR, mRNA-vaccinated individuals (n = 380) exhibited higher anti-S IgG titres and neutralising capacity compared to those who received Ad-vector vaccines (n = 200). After the booster, anti-spike IgG remained higher in mRNA-vaccinated individuals than in Ad-vector recipients (q < 0.001); Ad-vector vaccinated individuals showed superior neutralising capacity. Natural SARS-CoV-2 infection prior to vaccination had varying impact on anti-S IgG and neutralising capacity, depending on vaccination type and time points.
Conclusion: Our findings underscore that both vaccine platforms and prior infections shape the magnitude and quality of the humoral immune response, highlighting the importance of considering priming strategy, booster design and hybrid immunity when optimising COVID-19 vaccination schedules for durable protection.

Keywords: COVID‐19 vaccines; SARS‐CoV‐2; adenovirus; antibodies; healthcare workers; mRNA; serological tests; vaccination; vaccines; viral.

 
Back
Top Bottom