tetano
Editor, Senior Moderator
Influenza Other Respir Viruses
. 2022 Dec 22.
doi: 10.1111/irv.13087. Online ahead of print.
Investigating confounding in network-based test-negative design influenza vaccine effectiveness studies-Experience from the DRIVE project
Anke L Stuurman[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP], Miriam Levi[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Philippe Beutels[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Hélène Bricout[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Alexandre Descamps[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Gaël Dos Santos[SUP] 6 [/SUP], Ian McGovern[SUP] 7 [/SUP], Ainara Mira-Iglesias[SUP] 8 [/SUP], Jos Nauta[SUP] 9 [/SUP], Laurence Torcel-Pagnon[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Jorne Biccler[SUP] 1 [/SUP]; DRIVE consortium
Affiliations
Abstract
Background: Establishing a large study network to conduct influenza vaccine effectiveness (IVE) studies while collecting appropriate variables to account for potential bias is important; the most relevant variables should be prioritized. We explored the impact of potential confounders on IVE in the DRIVE multi-country network of sites conducting test-negative design (TND) studies.
Methods: We constructed a directed acyclic graph (DAG) to map the relationship between influenza vaccination, medically attended influenza infection, confounders, and other variables. Additionally, we used the Development of Robust and Innovative Vaccines Effectiveness (DRIVE) data from the 2018/2019 and 2019/2020 seasons to explore the effect of covariate adjustment on IVE estimates. The reference model was adjusted for age, sex, calendar time, and season. The covariates studied were presence of at least one, two, or three chronic diseases; presence of six specific chronic diseases; and prior healthcare use. Analyses were conducted by site and subsequently pooled.
Results: The following variables were included in the DAG: age, sex, time within influenza season and year, health status and comorbidities, study site, health-care-seeking behavior, contact patterns and social precautionary behavior, socioeconomic status, and pre-existing immunity. Across all age groups and settings, only adjustment for lung disease in older adults in the primary care setting resulted in a relative change of the IVE point estimate >10%.
Conclusion: Our study supports a parsimonious approach to confounder adjustment in TND studies, limited to adjusting for age, sex, and calendar time. Practical implications are that necessitating fewer variables lowers the threshold for enrollment of sites in IVE studies and simplifies the pooling of data from different IVE studies or study networks.
Keywords: adjustment; confounders; covariate; influenza vaccine effectiveness; test-negative design.
. 2022 Dec 22.
doi: 10.1111/irv.13087. Online ahead of print.
Investigating confounding in network-based test-negative design influenza vaccine effectiveness studies-Experience from the DRIVE project
Anke L Stuurman[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP], Miriam Levi[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Philippe Beutels[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Hélène Bricout[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Alexandre Descamps[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Gaël Dos Santos[SUP] 6 [/SUP], Ian McGovern[SUP] 7 [/SUP], Ainara Mira-Iglesias[SUP] 8 [/SUP], Jos Nauta[SUP] 9 [/SUP], Laurence Torcel-Pagnon[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Jorne Biccler[SUP] 1 [/SUP]; DRIVE consortium
Affiliations
- PMID: 36550627
- DOI: 10.1111/irv.13087
Abstract
Background: Establishing a large study network to conduct influenza vaccine effectiveness (IVE) studies while collecting appropriate variables to account for potential bias is important; the most relevant variables should be prioritized. We explored the impact of potential confounders on IVE in the DRIVE multi-country network of sites conducting test-negative design (TND) studies.
Methods: We constructed a directed acyclic graph (DAG) to map the relationship between influenza vaccination, medically attended influenza infection, confounders, and other variables. Additionally, we used the Development of Robust and Innovative Vaccines Effectiveness (DRIVE) data from the 2018/2019 and 2019/2020 seasons to explore the effect of covariate adjustment on IVE estimates. The reference model was adjusted for age, sex, calendar time, and season. The covariates studied were presence of at least one, two, or three chronic diseases; presence of six specific chronic diseases; and prior healthcare use. Analyses were conducted by site and subsequently pooled.
Results: The following variables were included in the DAG: age, sex, time within influenza season and year, health status and comorbidities, study site, health-care-seeking behavior, contact patterns and social precautionary behavior, socioeconomic status, and pre-existing immunity. Across all age groups and settings, only adjustment for lung disease in older adults in the primary care setting resulted in a relative change of the IVE point estimate >10%.
Conclusion: Our study supports a parsimonious approach to confounder adjustment in TND studies, limited to adjusting for age, sex, and calendar time. Practical implications are that necessitating fewer variables lowers the threshold for enrollment of sites in IVE studies and simplifies the pooling of data from different IVE studies or study networks.
Keywords: adjustment; confounders; covariate; influenza vaccine effectiveness; test-negative design.