• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Influenza Other Respir Viruses . Estimated Relative Effectiveness and Public Health Impact of Cell-Based Versus Egg-Based Influenza Vaccines During

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Influenza Other Respir Viruses


. 2025 Nov;19(11):e70180.
doi: 10.1111/irv.70180. Estimated Relative Effectiveness and Public Health Impact of Cell-Based Versus Egg-Based Influenza Vaccines During the 2022-2023 Season in the United States

Alicia N Stein[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Anusorn Thanataveerat[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Kimberly W McDermott[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Alex Dean[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Stephanie Wall[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Cory Pack[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Sheena G Sullivan[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Ian McGovern[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Mendel D M Haag[SUP] 5 [/SUP]



Affiliations
Abstract

Background: Egg adaptation can reduce the effectiveness of egg-based influenza vaccines. Previous studies have demonstrated improved effectiveness of cell versus egg-based quadrivalent influenza vaccines (QIVc and QIVe, respectively) during the 2017-2020 influenza seasons among persons aged ≥ 4 years. Here we evaluate the relative vaccine effectiveness (rVE) of QIVc versus QIVe in preventing test-confirmed influenza among persons aged 6 months to 64 years during the US 2022-2023 influenza season, along with the potential impact on influenza burden averted.
Methods: A retrospective test-negative design was applied to linked electronic health records and claims data from QIVc or QIVe recipients who were tested for influenza in routine outpatient care within 7 days of an acute respiratory or febrile illness. rVE was estimated by comparing the odds of testing positive among QIVc versus QIVe recipients, adjusted using doubly robust methodology. The influenza burden additionally averted by vaccination with QIVc versus QIVe was estimated using a published model.
Results: Of 43,086 patients included, 18.6% received QIVc and 81.4% received QIVe. The rVE of QIVc versus QIVe was 7.7% (95% CI, 0.9%-13.9%). Use of QIVc instead of QIVe during the 2022-23 influenza season would have prevented an additional 636,209 symptomatic cases of influenza, 314,130 outpatient visits, and 3759 hospitalizations.
Conclusions: QIVc was superior to QIVe in the prevention of test-confirmed influenza among persons aged 6 months to 64 years during the US 2022-2023 influenza season. The rVE of 7.7% would translate to a substantially reduced influenza burden if QIVc were used over QIVe.

Keywords: United States; cell‐based quadrivalent influenza vaccine; influenza; influenza burden; public health; vaccine effectiveness.

 
Back
Top Bottom