• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Influenza Hemagglutination-Inhibition Antibody Titer as a Correlate of Vaccine-Induced Protection

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Oxford Journals
Medicine
Journal of Infectious Diseases
Advance Access
10.1093/infdis/jir661

Influenza Hemagglutination-Inhibition Antibody Titer as a Correlate of Vaccine-Induced Protection

Suzanne E. Ohmit,
Joshua G. Petrie,
Rachel T. Cross,
Emileigh Johnson and
Arnold S. Monto

Department of Epidemiology, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor

Correspondence: Suzanne Ohmit, Dr PH, Department of Epidemiology, University of Michigan School of Public Health, 1415 Washington Heights, M5132 SPH II, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 (sohmit{at}umich.edu).

Abstract

Background. Antibody to influenza virus hemagglutinin has been traditionally associated with protection. Questions have been raised about its use as a surrogate for vaccine efficacy, particularly with regard to an absolute titer indicating seroprotection.

Methods. We examined hemagglutination-inhibition (HAI) antibody titers in subjects from a placebo-controlled trial of inactivated and live attenuated vaccines and compared titers in subjects with symptomatic influenza (cases) to those without influenza infection (noncases).

Results. Prevaccination and postvaccination geometric mean titers were both significantly lower for cases compared with noncases in all intervention groups. Frequency of postvaccination seroconversion did not significantly differ for cases and noncases in either vaccine group. Among live attenuated vaccine and placebo recipients, cases were less likely than noncases to have postvaccination HAI titers ≥32 or 64. Nearly all recipients of inactivated vaccine had postvaccination titers of at least 64, and the small number of vaccine failures were scattered across titers ranging from 64 to 2048.

Conclusions. While HAI antibody is the major correlate of protection, postvaccination titers alone should not be used as a surrogate for vaccine efficacy. Vaccine failures from clinical trials need to be examined to determine why seemingly protective HAI titers may not protect.

Clinical Trials Registration. NCT00538512.


http://jid.oxfordjournals.org/content/early/2011/10/12/infdis.jir661.short
 
Back
Top Bottom