tetano
Editor, Senior Moderator
Antiviral Res. 2012 Dec 25. pii: S0166-3542(12)00296-3. doi: 10.1016/j.antiviral.2012.12.016. [Epub ahead of print]
Influenza antiviral resistance in the Asia-Pacific region during 2011.
Leang SK, Deng YM, Shaw R, Caldwell N, Iannello P, Komadina N, Buchy P, Chittaganpitch M, Dwyer DE, Fagan P, Gourinat AC, Hammill F, Horwood PF, Huang QS, Ip PK, Jennings L, Kesson A, Kok T, Kool JL, Levy A, Lin C, Lindsay K, Osman O, Papadakis G, Rahnamal F, Rawlinson W, Redden C, Ridgway J, Sam IC, Svobodova S, Tandoc A, Wickramasinghe G, Williamson J, Wilson N, Yusof MA, Kelso A, Barr IG, Hurt AC.
Source
WHO Collaborating Centre for Reference and Research on Influenza, North Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Abstract
Despite greater than 99% of influenza A viruses circulating in the Asia-Pacific region being resistant to the adamantane antiviral drugs in 2011, the large majority of influenza A (>97%) and B strains (∼99%) remained susceptible to the neuraminidase inhibitors oseltamivir and zanamivir. However, compared to the first year of the 2009 pandemic, cases of oseltamivir-resistant A(H1N1)pdm09 viruses with the H275Y neuraminidase mutation increased in 2011, primarily due to an outbreak of oseltamivir-resistant viruses that occurred in Newcastle, as reported in Hurt et al. (2011c, 2012a), where the majority of the resistant viruses were from community patients not being treated with oseltamivir. A small number of influenza B viruses with reduced oseltamivir or zanamivir susceptibility were also detected. The increased detection of neuraminidase inhibitor resistant strains circulating in the community and the detection of novel variants with reduced susceptibility are reminders that monitoring of influenza viruses is important to ensure that antiviral treatment guidelines remain appropriate.
Copyright ? 2012. Published by Elsevier B.V.
PMID:
23274624
[PubMed - as supplied by publisher]
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23274624
Influenza antiviral resistance in the Asia-Pacific region during 2011.
Leang SK, Deng YM, Shaw R, Caldwell N, Iannello P, Komadina N, Buchy P, Chittaganpitch M, Dwyer DE, Fagan P, Gourinat AC, Hammill F, Horwood PF, Huang QS, Ip PK, Jennings L, Kesson A, Kok T, Kool JL, Levy A, Lin C, Lindsay K, Osman O, Papadakis G, Rahnamal F, Rawlinson W, Redden C, Ridgway J, Sam IC, Svobodova S, Tandoc A, Wickramasinghe G, Williamson J, Wilson N, Yusof MA, Kelso A, Barr IG, Hurt AC.
Source
WHO Collaborating Centre for Reference and Research on Influenza, North Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Abstract
Despite greater than 99% of influenza A viruses circulating in the Asia-Pacific region being resistant to the adamantane antiviral drugs in 2011, the large majority of influenza A (>97%) and B strains (∼99%) remained susceptible to the neuraminidase inhibitors oseltamivir and zanamivir. However, compared to the first year of the 2009 pandemic, cases of oseltamivir-resistant A(H1N1)pdm09 viruses with the H275Y neuraminidase mutation increased in 2011, primarily due to an outbreak of oseltamivir-resistant viruses that occurred in Newcastle, as reported in Hurt et al. (2011c, 2012a), where the majority of the resistant viruses were from community patients not being treated with oseltamivir. A small number of influenza B viruses with reduced oseltamivir or zanamivir susceptibility were also detected. The increased detection of neuraminidase inhibitor resistant strains circulating in the community and the detection of novel variants with reduced susceptibility are reminders that monitoring of influenza viruses is important to ensure that antiviral treatment guidelines remain appropriate.
Copyright ? 2012. Published by Elsevier B.V.
PMID:
23274624
[PubMed - as supplied by publisher]
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23274624