• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Influenza and respiratory syncytial viruses: Efficacy of different diagnostic assays

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Pak J Med Sci. 2015 Jul-Aug;31(4):791-4. doi: 10.12669/pjms.314.7003.
[h=1]Influenza and respiratory syncytial viruses: Efficacy of different diagnostic assays.[/h] Rahman MM[SUP]1[/SUP], Wong KK[SUP]2[/SUP], Alfizah H[SUP]3[/SUP], Hussin S[SUP]4[/SUP], Isahak I[SUP]5[/SUP].
[h=3]Author information[/h]

[h=3]Abstract[/h] [h=4]OBJECTIVE:[/h] To determine the efficacy of cell culture, immunoflourescence Assay (IFA) and real time polymerase chain reaction (rRT-PCR) in relation to diagnosis of influenza and Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV).
[h=4]METHODS:[/h] Total 2781 specimens of throat swabs and nasopharyngeal aspirates were obtained from patients suspected of respiratory viruses' infections from January 2009 to December 2011 at Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia Medical Centre(UKMMC). The specimens were processed by cell culture and immunoflurescence assay (IFA) and (rRT-PCR).
[h=4]RESULTS:[/h] Thirty three (1.19%) specimens were positive for influenza virus A and 42 (1.51%) were positive for RSV by cell culture and IFA. On the other hand, rRT-PCR was able to identify 189 of 505 (37.43%) specimens in which 65 were influenza A virus and 124 were RSV. Sensitivity of rRT-PCR was 100% for both influenza A virus and RSV and specificity was 88% and 77% for influenza A virus and RSV, respectively.
[h=4]CONCLUSION:[/h] rRT-PCR diagnosed respiratory viruses in shorter time with a high level of sensitivity in comparison to conventional assays - cell culture and IFA. These advantages help in managing patients by saving cost and hospitalization stay.


[h=4]KEYWORDS:[/h] Cell culture; Immunoflurescence Assay; Influenza virus; Real-time polymerase chain reaction (rRT-PCR); Respiratory Syncytial Virus

PMID: 26430404 [PubMed] PMCID: PMC4590406 Free PMC Article
 
Back
Top Bottom