• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Influence of commissioned provider type and deprivation score on uptake of the childhood flu immunization

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
J Public Health (Oxf). 2019 Jun 12. pii: fdz060. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdz060. [Epub ahead of print]
[h=1]Influence of commissioned provider type and deprivation score on uptake of the childhood flu immunization.[/h] Christensen H[SUP]1[/SUP], Reynolds R[SUP]1,[/SUP][SUP]2[/SUP], Kwiatkowska R[SUP]1,[/SUP][SUP]2,[/SUP][SUP]3[/SUP], Brooks-Pollock E[SUP]1,[/SUP][SUP]4[/SUP], Dominey M[SUP]5,[/SUP][SUP]6[/SUP], Finn A[SUP]1,[/SUP][SUP]7[/SUP], Gjini A[SUP]5,[/SUP][SUP]6[/SUP], Hickman M[SUP]1,[/SUP][SUP]2[/SUP], Roderick M[SUP]6[/SUP], Yates J[SUP]4,[/SUP][SUP]5[/SUP].
[h=3]Author information[/h]

[h=3]Abstract[/h] [h=4]BACKGROUND:[/h] Since 2015/16 the UK seasonal influenza immunization programme has included children aged 5 and 6 years. In the South West of England school-based providers, GPs or community pharmacies were commissioned to deliver the vaccine depending on the locality. We aimed to assess variation in vaccine uptake in relation to the type of commissioned provider, and levels of socioeconomic deprivation.
[h=4]METHODS:[/h] Data from the South West of England (2015-16 season) were analysed using multilevel logistic regression to assess variation in vaccine uptake by type of commissioned provider, allowing for clustering of children within delivery sites.
[h=4]RESULTS:[/h] Overall uptake in 5 and 6 year olds was 34.3% (37 555/109 404). Vaccine uptake was highest when commissioned through school-based programmes 50.2% (9983/19 867) and lowest when commissioned through pharmacies, 23.1% (4269/18 479). Delivery through schools resulted in less variation by site and equal uptake across age groups, in contrast to GP and pharmacy delivery for which uptake was lower among 6 year olds. Vaccine uptake decreased with increasing levels of deprivation across all types of commissioned provider.
[h=4]CONCLUSION:[/h] School-based programmes achieve the highest and most consistent rates of childhood influenza vaccination. Interventions are still needed to promote more equitable uptake of the childhood influenza vaccine.
? Crown copyright 2019.


[h=4]KEYWORDS:[/h] child; immunization; influenza; socioeconomic factors

PMID: 31188441 DOI: 10.1093/pubmed/fdz060
 
Back
Top Bottom